| |
This is something need to be Investigated Wednesday, 29 February 2012 - 9:11 PM SL Time |  | |
How did he know SL will end up with 320 |
Source(s)
self |
shamalp
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1287
Member Profile
|
 29 Feb 2012 15:35:43 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Berty,
Cricinfo is never in sync with the actual match. Most probably the man who asked the question was watching the match real-time while asking the question in Cricinfo which was 15 overs behind.
PS: if there is actual match fixing happening then lesser mortals like you, myself and this Aman would never know until a few years later.
Edited By - shamalp - 29 Feb 2012 15:38:28 GMT |
AMIGO
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7465
Member Profile
|
 29 Feb 2012 15:53:13 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Funny ,that commentator says Yadav is the India's power play specialist
lol, bugger did well in a one game and he become the specialist :))) |
Berty
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 39123
Member Profile
|
 29 Feb 2012 15:53:26 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| Shamalp...he predicted the correct score when SL was batting and it was 34.3 overs..RR at that time was 4.91...well if Pakistan was playing this would have been an immediate hit for Spot Fixing |
Berty
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 39123
Member Profile
|
29 Feb 2012 15:54:21 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Amigo San..
forget that did you see how Aman predicted the correct score |
AMIGO
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7465
Member Profile
|
29 Feb 2012 16:06:16 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Berty
May be Aman is a Indian Bookie.must have ask that to calculate the RR for another bet .
well i too believe it was a fixed match |
AMIGO
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7465
Member Profile
|
29 Feb 2012 16:17:10 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| May be he saw the prediction...currently 160/1 and if they score 10 runs per over from here on they will end up scoring 320 ? |
Spetsnaz1
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7926
Member Profile
|
29 Feb 2012 17:02:50 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| Hmmmm thats strange... Sad to say Sri Lankan cricket now looks like Indian and Pakistani cricket scandals..... |
bhoor
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 706
Member Profile
|
29 Feb 2012 17:32:22 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| SL meeting Aus in the final is a nightmare scenario for organizers and cricket itself ( business perspective ). Yes, hidden elements surely made sure India cruises in this match, at least, create the favorable environment for them. |
bhoor
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 706
Member Profile
|
29 Feb 2012 17:35:48 GMT Report for Abuse
|
The chances of Aus beating SL in the next game are 80/20 in favor, in contrast to what folks think Aus would prefer SL in the final rather than India.
Edited By - bhoor - 29 Feb 2012 17:39:29 GMT |
Shawnw
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 223
Member Profile
|
29 Feb 2012 17:35:55 GMT Report for Abuse
|
This is a coincident, no fixing here. Over the years what I have seen is that Indians have developed some sort of fear/mentality that they cannot lost to SL and at any cost they should win. Otherwise they will be humiliated losing to the small island nation. So whenever they play against SL, they wear that hyper-performance face to win SL matches. Right after SL lost the toss that I knew, India is going to do whatever it takes.
It was a small ground with Indian type pitch. I feel that SL lost strategically not sending Tissara, Maharoof, and Mathews right after Mahela to send the ball out of first 30 meters during power plays. In that way they could have use complete potential of their batsmen and score some 350+.
Actually, SL scored mere 60+ runs during first 15 overs. If SL thinks that they should not lost wickets of expertise batsmen like Dilshan, Mahela, they should let someone like Maharoof to open to take the advantage of power play overs. At the end of the day runs matter, not how many overs you play. |
|
