Remove Gotabhaya and save the country, UNPurges the government

  • 10 May 2007 12:22:17 GMT

    LTTE orders Ranil

    UNP tells the government

    silly no??


  • 10 May 2007 12:22:58 GMT

    I have been trying to get a visa for an extremely qualified Sri Lankan (Sinhalese) professional in a country called Kazakhstan. The potential employer is happy to pay this engineer about 50 times more salary than what he earns in SL at the moment.

    But Kazakhstan government does not give visa`s to Sri Lankans except on Gratis basis (usually for govt offcials and sportsmen representing the country). Nigeria is another country with severe restrctions - but not as harshly applied as they do on SL passports.

    It will take an ocean of turpentine to remove the tar on Sri Lankas name. If Mr Wickramasighe is tarnishing more over the tar mountain, I daresay he is not right.

  • 10 May 2007 13:49:53 GMT


    What is this, UN Purges?

    Take lime with honey or thick black coffee. It will be cured.

  • 10 May 2007 14:31:15 GMT

    Why only one?There are many more!

    Past and present.

  • 10 May 2007 14:55:06 GMT

    [LTTE orders Ranil

    UNP tells the government

    silly no??]

    So the LTTE wants Janaka Perera as Def Secretary???? So Janaka Perera is no longer the Hero who saved Jaffna but now a LTTE sympathyser????

    Pera is very very smart!! He sees things none of us ordinary joes see.... :) :)

  • 10 May 2007 15:24:07 GMT

    Its time to urge the UNP to REMOVE Ranil and to support

    Gothabaya............. to save the country.

    Somebidy had got the title mixed up........

  • 10 May 2007 17:24:52 GMT

    UNP! How about removing Ranil and putting an end to tomfoolery!

  • 10 May 2007 19:51:40 GMT


    If Ranil realy want Janaka Perera to be the Defense Secretary, why didnt he did it during his period??

    The truth is Ranil dont want to Mj.Gen.Perera to be the D.S. but he need a good bowler to crack down Gotabaya, in terms of cricket. Poor Ranil.. he cant stand himself...

  • 11 May 2007 00:56:22 GMT

    (a) A person like Anizam`s leader recommending Janaka Perera, to create divisions between armed forces, only results in belittling Janaka Pereras image as a national hero.

    (b)Anizam`s leader is again using his usual childish political strategy to stand up, and will fail as usual, Anizam better do something about it rather than criticizing others. (see the similarity between this Janaka talks and Parakramabahu talks during the last elections)

    (c)This letter suggests to prevent `further` military setbacks. It mean that we are still stronger than LTTE at present time after these so called setbacks.

    C.1 Therefore, I can only conclude that Anizam`s leader is envisioning and wishes for a future massive defeat of our military forces.

    Or else,

    (d)This letter suggests that we are militarily weak at present time due to shortcomings of the DS,

    D.1 but later suggests that we should `immediately` cease hostilities and go back to the discussion table,

    D.2 Therefore, we are going there as underdogs. Does it not contradict the suggestion that we should be militarily strong before commencing discussions?

    (E)Understandably, Anizam`s leader is fast running out with political options. With love to the largest, oldest political party in Sri Lanka, I suggest that someone dig the grave of good old JR, and appoint his skeletons, and his famous organs if remain intact, collectively as the leader of UNP.

    On a positive note

    (F)I appreciate UNP`s unwilling shift of paradigm to indirectly accepting the military action against LTTE.

    Vishnu D

  • 11 May 2007 01:31:55 GMT

    Long live our Opposition Leader (who is also good at Better Economic Management).