Welcome! guestuser
Re-Login as another member
|
|
|
Report this post by 'forest' for abuse
When you submit an abuse report, the modetrator will take an immediate look at this post and his/her previous posts to
see if there are any posting guideline violations are done by 'forest'.
Berty,
I don`t know who went on the offensive in this case. May be the LTTE, maybe the SLGovt. My point is that if the LTTE attacks `government held territory` then they should be attacked. Also their arms and weapons smuggling operation much be stopped. But if the the LTTE stick to their own territory and don`t attack govt soldiers, then fine, ignore them. Also, the govt should have very,very,very good reasons to send the soldiers out there to die. They must act to prevent uneccesary soldier deaths since these soldiers should not die in vain.
Also, the LTTE is a totailitarian organisation and the best way to show them up is at talks where their killing of opponents, use of child soldiers, extortion, failure to accept a power sharing agreement and devolution etc.etc. can be shown up.
Also talks in the best way to show up LTTE intransigence. So it is much better for the govt to go for talks etc. What other choice does the LTTE have except talk and accept a power sharing agreement anyway?
|
|
Search All News and Discussions