| Sri Lanka News Updates with Discussions |
Sri Lankan News & Discussions |
|
Report this post by 'GamaRaala' for abuse
When you submit an abuse report, the modetrator will take an immediate look at this post and his/her previous posts to
see if there are any posting guideline violations are done by 'GamaRaala'.
|
|
Lula quoted KI. Kula `seconded` Lula.
[NEEDLESS TO SAY, THAT DISSERTATION IS NOW COMPLETELY OUT OF DATE. MY OWN PERSPECTIVES AND INTERPRETATIONS HAVE CHANGED SINCE ITS COMPLETION.] KI changed his perspective. This perspective is written in KI-2005. A historical indepdent Tamil Kingdom has NO place in KI-1965 or KI-2005. You and Kula build your arguments on this myth, which has NO PLACE in the books of KI-1965 or KI-2005. You can either -embrace KI and reject Mythical Indepdent Tamil Kingdom or -reject KI and embrace Mythical Indepdent Tamil Kingdom Instead, what you and Kula do is to purport that you accept KI, but resort your arguments on the basis of Myths that have NO place in KI 1965 or KI 2005. This is why I keep saying KI is the worst enemy of Tamil Eelamists. :-) Their innocent dreamns of Historical Tamil Kingdoms are shattered into pieces when KI-2005 says `There was not even SL Tamil Identity prior to 12 CAD`. What Kingdoms, when they even did not have their own Identity? ;-) |
(C) 2000-2008 www.lankanewspapers.com - Sri Lankan News & Discussions - Contact Us - RSS Feed - News Archives - src - FAQ |
Search All News and Discussions