|
|
Canada s TYO Hosts Landmark Ki`liththaddu Tournament
Full News Article
Imperator
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 14594
Member Profile
|
 8 Sep 2011 11:28:22 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Shiva,
Tamil Pandyan princess from Madurai is INDIGENOUS ???
Ah so Kuveni and her Yakka tribe were Pandyan. Right.
And I guess it was written in Sinhalese by a pre-Vijayan Sinhalese ?
Refer Lord Buddha's three visits to the island. This was before Vijaya was even born.
Are you sure ???? You guys want to argue about something you don't even have the knowledge to talk about ! There are plenty of manuscripts talking about Tamil civilization in SL.
How old are their first mentions of SL Tamil civilization?
Now it is how Sinhala 'EVOLVED'!
No one ever said that the Sinhalese sprang up from the soil. Our heritage is a mix of indigenous Sri Lankan and various Indian cultures.
Invading - Borrowing - Killing.
That's what you masted in 2500 of history!
And that's good enough to keep you Demalas from running riot all over SL :)
. The Thiruparankundram inscription found near Madurai in Tamil Nadu and dated on palaeographical grounds to the 1st century BCE
Why are you bringing Madurai into this? OF COURSE they'd have an old civilization there, it's what Tamil Nadu means lol. |
Imperator
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 14594
Member Profile
|
8 Sep 2011 11:29:13 GMT Report for Abuse
|
TK,
I mean thats exactly why Yalpana Vaipava Malai which was supposed to have written in 1700s had to refer to Mahavansa instead of those 'tamil cronicles written in superior tamil'.. 'cos Jingalaas burned Jaffna Library!! :D
Oh dear :)))
|
CholaPandyan
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2427
Member Profile
|
 8 Sep 2011 11:44:51 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Imperator De Silva the cinnamon peeler,
One question I have to this theory is, why are there 2200-year-old Buddhist temples all over Sri Lanka (including Jaffna) while the oldest Hindu kovil in SL is only about 1000 years old? To this day, not one Demala has managed to give me an answer.
Even though your ancestors (Salagama) came from South India during the Portuguese period, after they got converted into Sinhala, automatically you have become kavum kana modayas.
oldest Hindu kovil in SL is only about 1000 years old?
Now, from where did you get the above information? Who did the carbon dating? Who did the research to come to the above conclusion?
First, let me talk about the Hindu kovils in SL. Do you know how old is the original Koneshwaram temple in Trinco and the original Muneshwaram temple in Chilaw (before your Portuguese ancestors destroyed them)???
Do you know how old is the Katharagama temple or Seenigama temple?
What a foolish modaya you are to think that a Hindu Kovil in SL belongs only to Demalas. More Singalayass than Demalas go to all the above Hindu temples to worship.
Now, let me talk about Buddhist temples. What makes you think that the Buddhist temples in SL were built by the Singalayass. Just because at present only the Singalayass are Buddhists that does not mean that even in the past Buddhism in SL belonged to only to Singalayass. Buddha s philosophy was shared among all including the Demalas. There is enough of research done by historians and anthropologists (available on the net) on the ancient people of SL. The ancient Demalas were also Buddhists and much better Buddhists than the present day Singalayass. They have also contributed to the Tripitaka.
I thought you are an educated fellow, but you seem to be the same old Singala Modayass forever.
|
ThinKing
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10569
Member Profile
|
 8 Sep 2011 12:28:04 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Chola,
First, let me talk about the Hindu kovils in SL. Do you know how old is the original Koneshwaram temple in Trinco and the original Muneshwaram temple in Chilaw (before your Portuguese ancestors destroyed them)???
do you know how old it is? the way you started I thought you were going to tell us ho old these Kovils are...well I was mistaken(yet again)
Do you know how old is the Katharagama temple or Seenigama temple?
do you know(again)?
What a foolish modaya you are to think that a Hindu Kovil in SL belongs only to Demalas. More Singalayass than Demalas go to all the above Hindu temples to worship.
so all these really old(we are still waiting for you to tell us how old they are..) are infact built by Sinhalese?? you are turning in to a hostile witness.. :D
Edited By - ThinKing - 8 Sep 2011 12:29:11 GMT |
Imperator
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 14594
Member Profile
|
8 Sep 2011 12:35:59 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Ah, it looks like the camel-molesting CholaPoondeyan has come out of hiding at last :)
Even though your ancestors (Salagama) came from South India during the Portuguese period,
Poondeymakkal, even Dutugemunu and Vijayabahu were born in Ruhuna. Did they also come from south India during the Portuguese period?
Do you know how old is the original Koneshwaram temple in Trinco and the original Muneshwaram temple in Chilaw
Yeah, that's why the oldest Hindu kovil is 1700 years old while the oldest Buddhist temples are at least 2200 years old, right?
What makes you think that the Buddhist temples in SL were built by the Singalayass
I never said that there weren't Tamil Buddhists in SL. I heard that there are about 10,000 Tamil Buddhists in Jaffna even now. But 99% of Tamils in SL converted to Hinduism later on. But tell me one thing, fancypants, how come none of our old temples have any Tamil inscriptions when some temples in Rajarata have Sinhala inscriptions?
I thought you are an educated fellow, but you seem to be the same old Singala Modayass forever.
You call me a cinnamon peeler and expected me to be smart? Well, now I have confirmation that thivediya pasangala like you nais have always been dumb dreamers :)))
TK,
do you know how old it is? the way you started I thought you were going to tell us ho old these Kovils are...well I was mistaken(yet again)
I also thought this camel humper would come and give an authoritative discourse on the exact age of SL kovils, only to be let down just like Shiva did. We must never have too high an opinion on these guys...we're not suddas, you know :))
so all these really old(we are still waiting for you to tell us how old they are..) are infact built by Sinhalese?? you are turning in to a hostile witness.. :D
Their multi-celled ingenuity is on show again!
Edited By - Imperator - 8 Sep 2011 12:37:57 GMT |
ThinKing
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10569
Member Profile
|
8 Sep 2011 12:48:25 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Impe,
how come none of our old temples have any Tamil inscriptions when some temples in Rajarata have Sinhala inscriptions?
why do you think these Tamil buddhists have to use Tamil scripts? Dont be a racist! just because it was used by Chingulas it is not a property of Jingalaas!
They(Tamil buddhists) used Sinhala(or what ever it was called at that time) script to write in the temples they build! Cant you understand such a simple thing?
we single cells are hopeless man!! :D |
CholaPandyan
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2427
Member Profile
|
8 Sep 2011 12:52:49 GMT Report for Abuse
|
ThinKing
Another Singala Modaya is asking me how old they are. Why do you want to believe me? Obviously, you do not want to believe what a Demala says so why do you expect me to say it?
You better go and read what the Singalaya says. Check what the erudite scholar and historian, Dr. Paul E. Pieris (a Singalaya) wrote/said to the Royal Asiatic Society about these ancient Hindu temples.
This is what the Singala historian Dr. Paul E. Pieris said to the Royal Asiatic Society:
'Long before the arrival of Vijaya there was in Lanka five recognised Ishwarams of Shiva which claimed and received adoration of all India. These were Thiruketheeshwaram which was near Mahatittha, Muneshwaram dominating Salawatte and the pearl fishery, Thondeshwaram near Mantota, ThiruKoneshwaram near the great Bay of Kottiyar and Naguleshwaram near Kankesanturai '.
Now, I know a Singala modayass like you may still ask how old is that, well, for your information, if the arrival of Vijaya was only 900 years ago, then the cinnamon peeler Imperator s calculation is correct, it is about 1000 years old. Does it make sense to you?
|
ShivaRebirth
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4065
Member Profile
|
 8 Sep 2011 12:55:45 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Hey you super smart Single-celled TK and Imp,
I also thought this camel humper would come and give an authoritative discourse on the exact age of SL kovils, only to be let down just like Shiva did.
I have given the dates. Read again my comments.
Imperator,
Since you don't know basic arithmetics and the meaning of 'B.C' you don't have any authority to even pronounce the word 'history'.
Yeah, that's why the oldest Hindu kovil is 1700 years old while the oldest Buddhist temples are at least 2200 years old, right?
According to some Jingala Buddhist , Tamils came in 1400 A.C. How come ? Were this 1700 old Hindu kovil built by Sinhala ???
Is that a Jingala logic ? :D
Ah so Kuveni and her Yakka tribe were Pandyan. Right.
Oh man.. Kuveni was a devil, no wonder her progenitors look alike :D
Refer Lord Buddha's three visits to the island.
So ? Does it mean there were Sinhalese Buddhists before Vijaya ? Is that another Jingala logic ? :D
How old are their first mentions of SL Tamil civilization?
Obviously, the Tamil civilization is older than the first Sangam.. older than 10'000 B.C, before the continent sunk and before Sri Lanka got separated from India.
Our heritage is a mix of indigenous Sri Lankan and various Indian cultures.
Indigenous Sri Lankan ??? Who are they ??? The ones who gave you 40% of your language ? Probably.
Why are you bringing Madurai into this?
It is you modaya who asked me to show references to Eelam from TN!! |
ShivaRebirth
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4065
Member Profile
|
8 Sep 2011 13:00:01 GMT Report for Abuse
|
This is what the Singala historian Dr. Paul E. Pieris said to the Royal Asiatic Society:
Learned Singala are not match to the LNP Jingalas!
Some early temples were built as early as 2500 B.C which is almost 2000 years before Buddha and the North Indian invasion. Many also were destroyed/sacked by Portuguese.
Edited By - ShivaRebirth - 8 Sep 2011 13:00:44 GMT |
SamP
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1852
Member Profile
|
 8 Sep 2011 13:01:59 GMT Report for Abuse
|
ShiverR, CholoaPundey, and Other Peelamic Refuse,
Form where did you find your funny history of 2,500 BC Peelamic Civilization in Sri Lanka. Just as usual, Peelamoids create lies and repeat them over and over hoping it is going to be the accepted history. The reality is Peelamic ancestors are mere invaders and destroyers of what Sinhalese built over 2600 years. You simply have no credible claim to this nation. We welcome all walks of life in this great land but no part will ever be given to the terrorists like you. Since you started talking about non existent history of 2,5000 BC Peelamic Civilization, I openly challenge you to show the source of your information and one single piece of archaeological evidence support you claims. If you can't, you shall cease repeating blatant Eelam lies.
Edited By - SamP - 8 Sep 2011 13:05:13 GMT |
|
