|
|
Sri Lanka war risk insurance rating lowered
Full News Article
iross1000
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Member Profile
|
 20 Jun 2009 22:44:04 GMT Report for Abuse
|
He did no such thing, he died like a pig in the mud!
LTTE vs SLDF, India, USA, Iran, Pakistan, China ...
With this scenario SLDF victory wasn't anything great, anyone could have done it, even the Vatican Army.
To kill few hundred Tamil Tiger leaders, several thousand Tamil civilians have been killed (not to mention the enormous foreign help), with this approach anyone can defeat the militancy in their country. |
iross1000
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Member Profile
|
20 Jun 2009 22:49:23 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Corrections:
Suppose to be Is it fair ?
Suppose to be cultivation |
iross1000
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Member Profile
|
20 Jun 2009 22:53:55 GMT Report for Abuse
|
World will learn from us how to destroy terrorism - Army chief
Nothing to learn here, use heavy weapons to kill several thousand civilians to get rid of few hunder top militant leaders, anyone can do it.
It is a bit like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. |
iross1000
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Member Profile
|
20 Jun 2009 22:57:25 GMT Report for Abuse
|
The smell, Binks, the smell... they don't have water too bathe and the sea off Chennai is too polluted with what the rains wash off the Chennai streets regularly!
Why pick on a country that provided big help to defeat LTTE ?
One should be greatful for the help they got. |
tigeress19
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 19545
Member Profile
|
 20 Jun 2009 23:03:22 GMT Report for Abuse
|
india,china, pakistan, USA, ect ect When the parties to the war involved in the asymmetric warfare, the weaker one is guranteed to loose....
in the maha bharatha....the pancha pandavas won the war due to the use of same tactic...staged and lead by krishna...
Asymmetric warfare originally referred to war between two or more belligerents whose relative military power differs significantly. Contemporary military thinkers tend to broaden this to include asymmetry of strategy or tactics today 'asymmetric warfare' can describe a conflict in which the resources of two belligerents differ in essence and in the struggle, interact and attempt to exploit each other's characteristic weaknesses. Such struggles often involve strategies and tactics of unconventional warfare, the 'weaker' combatants attempting to use strategy to offset deficiencies in quantity or quality. 1 Such strategies may not necessarily be militarized. 2 This is in contrast to symmetric warfare, where two powers have similar military power and resources and rely on tactics that are similar overall, differing only in details and execution.
Edited By - tigeress19 - 20 Jun 2009 23:05:46 GMT |
AnuD
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37245
Member Profile
|
 20 Jun 2009 23:05:46 GMT Report for Abuse
|
IRos:
LTTE
vs
SLDF, India, USA, Iran, Pakistan, China ...
IF this is the case, I am wondering why USA can not win Iraq or Afghanistan with all the weapons in the world and WITH THE HELP OF so called ALLIED FORCES. |
AnuD
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37245
Member Profile
|
20 Jun 2009 23:08:50 GMT Report for Abuse
|
To kill few hundred Tamil Tiger leaders, several thousand Tamil civilians have been killed (not to mention the enormous foreign help), with this approach anyone can defeat the militancy in their country.
You lost now whining. |
tigeress19
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 19545
Member Profile
|
20 Jun 2009 23:13:37 GMT Report for Abuse
|
IF this is the case, I am wondering why USA can not win Iraq or Afghanistan with all the weapons in the world and WITH THE HELP OF so called ALLIED FORCES.
USA is a leading country in terms of militarily and financially (i know they are down now) around the world while embracing democracy...but at the same time..some savage countries like you savage come from are questioning their own human rights records to hide your own attrocities...that makes the countries like USA ineffective interms of imposing the values of human rights in other parts of the world......if the US to fight the war like you savages do, then ..sure they would have won the won in a day or two... |
AnuD
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37245
Member Profile
|
20 Jun 2009 23:16:10 GMT Report for Abuse
|
..if the US to fight the war like you savages do, then ..sure they would have won the won in a day or two...
If we fought the war in the way that USA is fighting the the war in IRaQ, we are better off. then we don't have 275,000 to look after and feed. Then it is very long since they became mahaveerars. |
|
Search All News and Discussions