| | Cause of death and death of cause Friday, 30 October 2009 - 3:04 PM SL Time | | | Cause of death? It depends what you do for a living...
Death certificates reveal link with choice of career
By Andy McSmith
Friday, 30 October 2009
Work can be very bad for your health if you are in the wrong job. If you are a carpenter, fitter, electrician, plumber or gas fitter, you run an above average risk of dying from an asbestos-related disease.
If you are coal miner, there an abnormally high chance that you will die of pneumoconiosis, whereas if you are mining for any mineral other than coal, or working in a quarry, the risk is that silicosis will kill you.
And publicans, bar staff and kitchen staff, particularly if they are male, are statistically more likely than other people to be killed by drink.
The new statistics that show how work can kill come from a huge study by a research team led by Professor David Coggon of Southampton University, who took data from more than 40,000 death certificates issued during the 1990s to collate how people died and what jobs they had done in their lifetimes.
However, their research, published yesterday by the Office for National Statistics comes with a warning not to overinterpret the bald figures. `The results are purely statistical, which means that they cannot prove a causal link between an occupation and a disease, proving only evidence of a statistical association,` the study`s authors say.
For example, it is a fact that male hairdressers are much more likely than almost anyone else to die from Aids. But this does not in any case suggest that cutting hair causes Aids, because the statistics also show that women hairdressers are less likely than most people to die from the disease. There are other professional groups that are also at greater than average risk from Aids, including tailors, dressmakers, nurses, journalists and other literary and artistic types. Creative people, and people in certain trades in the construction industry, are also more likely than most to die from drug abuse.
Another mystery, which has shown up previously in statistical surveys of this kind, is an unusually high death rate from lymphatic cancer among schoolteachers and university lecturers. There have been serious studies trying to pinpoint whether there is something in the classroom or a lecture hall that is silently killing them, but so far, none has been uncovered.
However, one bright statistician has noticed that the same professional group has a very low death rate from lung cancer or heart disease. By behaving sensibly, they have seemingly avoided the commonest killers, but still have to die from something. Hence what the statisticians call the `spurious consequence` of an unusually high incidence of a different cancer.
The figures also reveal that doctors, dentists, vets, nurses, and women working in the ambulance service are more likely than most people to commit suicide. That should not be taken to mean that their work drives them to despair. What it shows is that when health workers feel suicidal, they have the know-how to kill themselves, and the means are readily to hand.
The statistics also suggested that if you work behind a bar, or you are a man working in the construction industry you are unusually likely to be murdered. For bar staff, that may be a hazard of working among people fuelled by drink. Among construction workers the cause is not, so far as is known, the work itself that draws violence.
Statistically, by far the most dangerous thing anyone can do during the course of their work perhaps not surprisingly is drive a car. During the period covered by the study, about 130 men and five women were killed each year by accidents at work, and more than 50 of those were in car accidents.
|
Source(s) Independent UK |
Aani Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 15174 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 09:08:09 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Sri Lanka is a strange place.
If you are President or PM of Sri Lanka you are more than likely to die from a bomb or a bullet.
If you are an opposition leader you are very likely to hit a tree and die.
Ex army generals with political ambitions die of 'LTTE' suicide bombs.
And guerilla leaders die sfter surrendering (including Wijeweera). |
VeerSingh
Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 1729 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 09:41:09 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Aani,
Sri Lanka is a strange place.
I dont think so. Whether it s Sri Lanka or Peshawar or Baghdad or WTC a death is a death. One has to die today or tomorrow. Does it matter after the death if it was bullet or bomb or Tsunami wave or leukemia or H1N1. You me and every one, one day or other have to die. BTW, are you afraid of that angel called death :))))
VS |
Semmozhi Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 5589 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 09:46:27 GMT Report for Abuse
|
VS,
your definition of eelam is as reasonable as your contentions with the freedom movement of eelam tamils. |
VeerSingh
Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 1729 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 10:22:35 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Semmozhi,
your definition of eelam is as reasonable
When did i define eelam. Don't credit me with more more and accreditation please.
freedom movement of eelam tamils
If some one want to reclaim the lost ground of worshiping place it is Hindu extremism, but if some one kills the whole country for 30 long years, it s freedom fight. BTW, which dictionary you derive meaning from :)))
In simple terms, if Baabri Masijid Demolition is an act of Hindu extremism, then killings by LTTE and its men are barbaric terrorism. I can agree that Baabri Masijid Demolition is an act of Hindu extremism, but will you agree that LTTE and its men are nothing but barbaric terrorist. Come on yaar, you can't desire both mush and koozh :))))
VS |
Semmozhi Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 5589 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 10:44:51 GMT Report for Abuse
|
VS,
When did i define eelam.
what was that radioactive fish thingy :))
In simple terms, if Baabri Masijid Demolition is an act of Hindu extremism, then killings by LTTE and its men are barbaric terrorism. I can agree that Baabri Masijid Demolition is an act of Hindu extremism, but will you agree that LTTE and its men are nothing but barbaric terrorist. Come on yaar, you can't desire both mush and koozh :))))
i dont want to repeat the orange vs apple cliche, anyhow ..since now you are speaking :
1) LTTE and Hindu extremism can NEVER be compared.
2) LTTE killed its enemies , it did end up killing innocents, but innocents never were the target.
3) LTTE is discplined, ideological and progressive organization unlike hindu extremists who derive their inspiration in religious chauvinism exhibhited by Taliban.
I would have agreed if you compared LTTE with Naxalites ...they are both reflection of inequality / disorder / opression in the socio-politic nature of each country they originate from.
Demolishers of Babri (hindu extremists), demolishers of monumental 'Buddhas of Bamyan' ( taliban ) and the demolishers of Jaffna Library ( Sinhala extremists) are low life idiots. No offences meant.
Edited By - Semmozhi - 30 Oct 2009 10:50:35 GMT |
Semmozhi Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 5589 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 11:01:13 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| That doesnt take away the mistakes of LTTE, but might help you understand the context. |
Gayan1
Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 743 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 11:17:34 GMT Report for Abuse
|
but innocents never were the target.
How can you say that?? Don't you remember Kebithigollawa, Aranthale, all those bus bombs and bombs around Colombo??
LTTE is discplined, ideological and progressive
Thank you!! LMAO That's rich!! :-))) You Eelamists sure are funny!! |
Semmozhi Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 5589 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 11:34:51 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Gayan,
LTTE is discplined, ideological and progressive
Thank you!! LMAO That's rich!! :-))) You Eelamists sure are funny!!
Marshall R Singer,( Ph. D. Professor of International and Intercultural Affairs, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs - University of Pittsburgh) Statement before US Congress Committee on International Relations Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific Hearing on Sri Lanka November 14,1995 :
As far as I can tell most ordinary Tamils support the Tigers, not necessarily because they like them, but because they like the Sri Lankan - or Indian - armies less. The Tigers are ruthless and authoritarian but they are not corrupt - they dont tolerate stealing, bribery or rape, things other armies are famous for. In fact they are perceived as being single minded in their defence of Tamils. They are so disciplined that when captured, they swallow cyanide capsules that they carry with them at all times, rather than risk revealing anything under torture.
get the point , or are you blind ? |
VeerSingh
Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 1729 Member Profile
|
30 Oct 2009 11:35:03 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Semmozhi,
ROFL :))) You at very best reminded me the GG's my ---- doesn't stink theory. In most decent way I can tag reply as a futile attempt to glorify LTTE as noble element. The world is not going to buy this intelligence nor it did earlier :))
In Tamizh people also call it as Vaarthai Jaalangal. In colloquial Hindi referred as Garam Havaa :)))
The jargons (suppression, oppression, disciplined, ideological and progressive organization) which you are applying to sanitize LTTE and its actions can be applied to Islamic chauvinism, Hindu chauvinism, more importantly the actions of Israelis (the Jews connection, hope you understand why i say this)
what was that radioactive fish thingy :))
Oh Oh, I tried word building game :))) Is it sounding like Eezham?? I am pleasantly surprised. Am i not intelligent like Eric Berne's and his works. One of my favorite is Games people play penned by him. Come on yaar wont you appreciate my skills :)))
Now a days I am learning Sinhala to give few guys some more surprises. Many here have already branded me as veera singhe or some thing :)))) I liked some thing like Raghu Veera Wikrama Singhe.
OKAY, See you in another post which is interesting enough to bash at each other :)))
VS |
|