Umpiring

Tendulkar favours no referrals but more technology

Cricinfo staff

October 26, 2009

Sachin Tendulkar has admitted that he's not in favour of the umpire referrals system and prefers technology - including Hot Spot for bat-pad catches - to be extended to all decisions except lbw appeals and where the batsman is bowled.

Tendulkar also suggested that the umpires in the middle be rotated in the same match, which would allow them time to rest, recharge and concentrate better.

His views echoed those of recently retired umpire Steve Bucknor and former Test umpire Peter Willey.

'I'm not particularly happy with the referrals because I'm not convinced of the angles (on television),' Tendulkar told India Today magazine. 'I'm not convinced. I wasn't happy when we first went through it -on India's tour of Sri Lanka last year.'

The referrals system was first tried out during India's Sri Lanka tour and the innovation has since been used only on a trial basis though it will be re-introduced on a permanent basis from this month.

However, Tendulkar said he was in favour of increasing technology in cricket to reduce the load on the umpire, helping him to be more focused and therefore more accurate.

'It is tough for the umpires to watch the no-balls and watch what's happening in the front. For the basic line decisions you have to have a laser or something like that... the no-ball is like tennis (in which there is a beep during a let when the ball hits the net during a serve)... you can call it with a machine.'

After the initial trials, the ICC had decided to include the Hot Spot to assist the third umpire. Tendulkar welcomed the innovation and added that cricket should capitalise on that aid.

'We are still using technology for close catches,' Tendulkar said. 'They should use the Hot Spot for the bat-pad decision so the main umpire has to only make the LBW calls. I'm quite happy with the Hot Spot because that establishes the contact.

'For the caught behind, the Hot Spot will come. Close in catches again the Hot Spot will come. You don't need a machine for the clean bowled, so the lbw decisions are all the umpire has to concentrate on.'

Tendulkar understood the pressure on-field umpires face these days with every error - glaring or marginal - scrutnised and criticized by experts. He said a rotation system within the same game may help.

'Maybe we could have umpires doing a session each and so have three umpires for a game, so umpires do get time off also.'

Q- I noticed that Zimbabwe's Hamilton Masakadza twice passed 150 in the recent one-day series against Kenya. Is this unprecedented? asked Danyal Rasool from Pakistan
A- Hamilton Masakadza made 156 against Kenya in the first match of the recent series in Harare, and 178 not out in the fifth, also in Harare. This is indeed the first time a batsman has made 150 or more twice in the same one-day series. Sri Lanka's Sanath Jayasuriya did pass 150 twice in successive innings three days apart, but they weren't in the same series: on July 1, 2006, he made 152 against England at Headingley, and three days later he smashed 157 against the Netherlands in Amstelveen. Jayasuriya is the only man to have reached 150 four times in ODIs: Sachin Tendulkar and a trio of handy West Indians - Chris Gayle, Brian Lara and Viv Richards - have all done it three times.

Sachin Goes Against Reffereal System

Surprising to note on Sachin's statement, when the refferal system can minimize umpiring errors to a great extent.

he was amont the very first victims to the system,,,, this can be the reason

Surprising to note on Sachin's statement, when the refferal system can minimize umpiring errors to a great extent.