Lanka Newspapers

Sri Lanka News Updates with Discussions

Lanka NewspapersRobins's Home PageThis Page




Who Will Celebrate the Loss of GSP ? Patriots or Fake Patriots? He He He He He

Saturday, 17 October 2009 - 8:20 PM SL Time

The European Commission is to recommend withdrawing trade benefits from Sri Lanka over alleged human rights abuses in the last stages of the civil war against the Tamil Tigers, The Times has learnt.

The decision could affect British shops including Marks & Spencer, Tesco and Next, which have imported hundreds of millions of poundsworth of Sri Lankan-made clothes since the benefits were granted after a tsunami in 2004. The scheme waives import taxes.

Withdrawing the benefits would add about 6 per cent to the cost of products, forcing many retailers to buy from cheaper producers such as China, India and Bangladesh.

It is the most drastic international response yet to the war in which UN officials estimate that 20,000 civilians died and to the subsequent detention of 300,000 Tamil civilians in internment camps.

Related Links
Sri Lanka is ducking human rights issues
Britain tells Sri Lanka to free Tamil prisoners
The Sri Lankan garment industry accounts for 10 per cent of GDP, employs about 250,000 people and recorded exports of $1.4 billion ( 856 million) to the EU last year.

EU officials said that they had no option because the scheme obliged Sri Lanka to abide by rights agreements and its Government had refused to co-operate.

The commission will make the recommendation on Monday when it formally approves and publishes the results of an investigation. A decision will not be taken until the end of the year.

The EU grants the Generalised System of Preferences Plus (GSP+), to help developing countries to boost their economies while improving human rights and labour standards. Sri Lanka is the only country in Asia to benefit from GSP+, which obliges beneficiaries to adhere to 27 international rights agreements.

The EU has investigated whether Sri Lanka violated the UN Convention against Torture, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In August it completed a report, which described a culture of complete or virtually complete impunity in Sri Lanka , citing police torture, abductions of journalists and uninvestigated disappearances.

Sri Lankan officials accused the EU of seeking to punish workers. Its ministers met business leaders and politicians in London and Brussels.

They won support from Sir Stuart Rose, the chairman of Marks & Spencer, who met the Sri Lankan Trade Minister in London in June.

We believe it [GSP+] is advantageous for the company and our customers and important for Sri Lanka, a spokesman for the shop said this week.


Source(s)
Times

 Post a reply to this

 E-mail this to a friend




AMIGO
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2706
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 13:42:40 GMT  Report for Abuse  
See here ....
an interview with Robins on Tamil Peelam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_63-QH3eqg&feature=player_embedded
RealKaruna
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3270
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 14:05:25 GMT  Report for Abuse  
Who Will Celebrate the Loss of GSP ?


I am not celebrating. It is sad for Sri Lanka, but is a direct result of the contempt for human rights shown by the Rajapakses.
Pawan98
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10295
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 14:17:20 GMT  Report for Abuse  
We didnt start living after getting GSP so take the GSP out and stop interfering in our affairs. thats the message to EU.
AMIGO
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2706
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 14:24:07 GMT  Report for Abuse  
Pawan
so easy for you to say :o(
Robins
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15126
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 14:31:58 GMT  Report for Abuse  
It is so easy for you to say


He He He He He

Let see a real argument about GSP from one of Three Amigos and Pawan
Pawan98
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10295
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 14:58:35 GMT  Report for Abuse  
AMIGO, GSP came in 2005 isnt it.

The Sri Lankan garment industry accounts for 10 per cent of GDP, employs about 250,000 people and recorded exports of $1.4 billion ( 856 million) to the EU last year.


Its only 10%, So if the govt really care they can make an effort and develop the other 90% and fill this 10% gap easily. Out the 10% the GSP caters to only EU, so part of the 10% would not be affected by this GSP.

Edited By - Pawan98 - 17 Oct 2009 15:01:20 GMT
samanj
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3902
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 15:02:41 GMT  Report for Abuse  
There is no loss of GSP.
This is getting even by Sweden as their FM was prevented from visiting SL with jokers Mili Banda & Kouchner.

Their term will end in december and thereafter everything will be back to normal.

This is just a hic up on the way.
Pawan98
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10295
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 15:08:20 GMT  Report for Abuse  
If the govt can cut back on their unnecessary expenditure and apply the tax regime fairly and squarely removing the loop holes we can fill the void that would be created by the removal of GSP.
RealKaruna
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3270
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 15:53:55 GMT  Report for Abuse  
Pawan
so easy for you to say :o(


Pawan98 must be coming from an upper class family. He does not care about poor people losing their jobs.
RealKaruna
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3270
Member Profile
LK Information  17 Oct 2009 15:57:50 GMT  Report for Abuse  
Its only 10%, So if the govt really care they can make an effort and develop the other 90% and fill this 10% gap easily. Out the 10% the GSP caters to only EU, so part of the 10% would not be affected by this GSP.


Incorrect economics. Loss of GSP+ means that garment and other exports from Sri Lanka to the EU will cost 10% more. That means the EU will tend to buy from the other 15 countries which continue to enjoy GSP+, except for very high quality garments from Sri Lanka which are bought by wealthy people for whom 10% extra is affordable.

If the govt can cut back on their unnecessary expenditure and apply the tax regime fairly and squarely removing the loop holes we can fill the void that would be created by the removal of GSP.


That is what the government cannot/will not do.


Edited By - RealKaruna - 17 Oct 2009 16:01:12 GMT
Page | 1  | 2  |  >Next
 Post a reply to this      E-mail this to a friend

(C) 2000-2008 www.lankanewspapers.com - Sri Lankan News & Discussions - Contact Us - RSS Feed - News Archives - src - FAQ