| | India Learns Lesson From Sri Lanka - Use Of Military Againt Naxals Is Ruled Out Tuesday, 13 October 2009 - 10:28 PM SL Time | | | Mumbai, Oct 11 (PTI) Refusing to bracket Naxals with terrorists, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today ruled out use of armed forces against them and said that the government is willing to hold talks with them if they abjured violence.
`They (Naxals) are banned organisations and are covered under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act,` he said replying to a question if the government proposed to declare the ultra-left groups as terror outfits.
`We are not in favour of using the armed forces against the Naxalites. The para-military forces and police are adequate (for counter-Naxal operations),` he told a press meet here and underscored the need for looking at the causes of alienation of the people, particularly the tribals.
While terming Naxalism as the biggest internal security threat, the Prime Minister said dialogue with them was possible only if they shunned violence |
Source(s) PTI |
chennaiguuy Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 25119 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:31:10 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Hindon (Uttar Pradesh), Oct 8 (ANI): The Indian Air Force is all set to deploy its special Garuda forces against Naxals in self defence while operating in Maoist-infested areas, but ruled out any Rambo-style operation against the rebels.
The Indian Air Force is awaiting a nod from the Government, which is most likely to come today after a meeting of the Union Cabinet, to deploy Garuda commando units to defend its helicopters and men in Naxal-infested areas.
Referring to the killing of IAF personnel in a Naxal attack on November 14, 2008, last year while facilitating state assembly elections in Chhattisgarh, ACM Naik said this incident resulted in the IAF requesting the Defence Ministry to permit it to open fire on Maoists in self defence.
It is the Same MI-17 Planes that are gonna fire on naxals like SL did !
So dont hide things when the surgery is needed ..
This action on Naxals was LONG LONG overdue !
:-))
Edited By - chennaiguuy - 13 Oct 2009 15:32:23 GMT |
Maninder Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 3770 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:32:02 GMT Report for Abuse
|
We are not in favour of using the armed forces against the Naxalites. The para-military forces and police are adequate (for counter-Naxal operations),' he told a press meet here and underscored the need for looking at the causes of alienation of the people, particularly the tribals.
This is a profound statement. Use of force is part of a wider political strategy. Not the other way around. |
Dewey Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 8654 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:32:20 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Chennai:
Why sudden change of tactics? Why not holding talks with freedom fighters?
BTW, Govt will say something for international consumption and do something totally different. They will have to kick the daylight out of the terrorists who engage in bombing the schools and infrastructure.
Edited By - Dewey - 13 Oct 2009 15:33:33 GMT |
Semmozhi
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 5474 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:32:55 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Stamp out the Naxals: They have no place in Shining India
People who have taken to arms (Naxals) have done so with full knowledge of what the consequences of that decision will be. They have done so knowing that they are on their own. They know that the new laws of the land criminalise the poor and conflate resistance with terrorism. (Peaceful activists are ogws-overground workers.) They know that appeals to conscience, liberal morality and sympathetic press coverage will not help them now. They know no international marches, no globalised dissent, no famous writers will be around when the bullets fly.
Hundreds of thousands have broken faith with the institutions of India's democracy. Large swathes of the country have fallen out of the government's control. (At last count, it was supposed to be 25 per cent). The battle stinks of death, it's by no means pretty. How can it be when the helmsman of the army of Constraining Ghosts is the ghost of Chairman Mao himself? (The ray of hope is that many of the footsoldiers don't know who he is. Or what he did. More Genocide Denial? Maybe). Are they Idealists fighting for a Better World? Well... anything is better than annihilation.
The Prime Minister has declared that the Maoist resistance is the 'single largest internal security threat'. There have even been appeals to call out the army. The media is agog with breathless condemnation.
Here's a typical newspaper report. Nothing out of the ordinary. Stamp out the Naxals, it is called.
This government is at last showing some sense in tackling Naxalism. Less than a month ago, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh asked state governments to 'choke' Naxal infrastructure and 'cripple' their activities through a dedicated force to eliminate the 'virus'. It signalled a realisation that Naxalism must be stamped out through enforcement of law, rather than wasteful expense on development.
'Choke'. 'Cripple'. 'Virus'. 'Infested'. 'Eliminate'. 'Stamp Out'.
Yes. The idea of extermination is in the air. And people believe that faced with extermination, they have the right to fight back.By any means necessary.
Perhaps they've been listening to the grasshoppers.
Arundathi Roy - Listening to Grasshoppers
Edited By - Semmozhi - 13 Oct 2009 15:33:44 GMT |
Maninder Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 3770 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:34:26 GMT Report for Abuse
|
It is the Same MI-17 Planes that are gonna fire on naxals like SL did !
IAF is involved in transporting police officers. Garuds are deployed to protect the choppers if they come under attack.
They are authorized to fire only in self defence and are not part of the offensive against naxals.
Edited By - Maninder - 13 Oct 2009 15:35:42 GMT |
Semmozhi
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 5474 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:34:53 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| Btw its a sane PR stunt... however i hope we dont do a sri lanka ... we wont survive |
chennaiguuy Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 25119 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:34:58 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Garuds are deployed to protect the choppers if they come under attack.
LOL !
So Naxals have SAM ?
:-)) |
Maninder Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 3770 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:37:02 GMT Report for Abuse
|
So Naxals have SAM ?
No. they can attack when the chopper is on ground in the middle of some conflict. |
Semmozhi
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 5474 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:39:32 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Stamp out the Naxals: They have no place in Shining India ...2
But there is a problem, and the problem is lebensraum. A Kingdom needs its lebensraum. Where will the Kingdom in the Sky find lebensraum? The Sky Citizens look towards the Old Nation. They see Adivasis sitting on the bauxite mountains of Orissa, on the iron ore in Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. They see the people of Nandigram (Muslims, Dalits) sitting on prime land, which really ought to be a chemical hub. They see thousands of acres of farm land, and think, these really ought to be Special Economic Zones for our industries they see the rich fields of Singur and know this really ought to be a car factory for the People's Car. They think: that's our bauxite, our iron ore, our uranium. What are those people doing on our land? What's our water doing in their rivers? What's our timber doing in their trees?
If you look at a map of India's forests, its mineral wealth and the homelands of the Adivasi people, you'll see that they're stacked up over each other.
So, in reality, those who we call poor are the truly wealthy. But when the Sky Citizens cast their eyes over the land, they see superfluous people sitting on precious resources. The Nazis had a phrase for them- berzahligen Essern, superfluous eaters.
The struggle for lebensraum, Friedrich Ratzel said after closely observing the struggle between Native Indians and their European colonisers in North America, is an annihilating struggle. Annihilation doesn't necessarily mean the physical extermination of people-by bludgeoning, beating, burning, bayoneting, gassing, bombing or shooting them. (Except sometimes. Particularly when they try to put up a fight. Because then they become Terrorists.) Historically, the most efficient form of genocide has been to displace people from their homes, herd them together and block their access to food and water. Under these conditions, they die without obvious violence and often in far greater numbers.
Arundathi Roy - Listening to Grasshoppers |
bakamoona Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 12610 Member Profile
|
13 Oct 2009 15:39:36 GMT Report for Abuse
|
We are not in favour of using the armed forces against the Naxalites. The para-military forces and police are adequate
As if the para-militaries & police are gonna fight them unarmed!
Isnt that what they have been doing all along? And successful?
See the amount of HR violation charges there are against the Paras and Police? |
|