|
|
Sri Lanka Army Chief says two thirds of operations completed
Full News Article
tigerforce Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 2358 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:32:06 GMT Report for Abuse
|
[ltte doctrine is defence in depth/defend a cer tain position for a time and kill as many sla s possible/then withdraw]
[ltte neede the cadres from vidalithivu front for action in another place if ltte had decided to defend many sla would have died]
[sarath told saffron clad monkies victory certain /[jayasikuru] let us wait and see. |
Ariyalai_SB Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1389 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:34:01 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Peace,
What we need to re-establish is the Sri Lankan nationalism which existed before the arrival of British.
I am not ignorant to make such a remark! Please just examine/compare the 1948 constitution with the current one, then you may be able grasp as to what was on about. It has been well documented not just by many Tamil scholars but by many Sinhalese and foreign thinkers to this effect. If you want to believe that there is no such thing as Sinhala Buddhist Hegemony, please be my guest, but you cannot escape the fact! |
piranha Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 2086 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:38:18 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Expressing his views, the Asgiriya prelate said certain leaders of the South who are averse to the operations unleashed against the LTTE, are obstructing the progress with the purpose of achieving narrow political gains
How nice. A warmonger headpriest.A beacon of the pacifist buddhist religion! What a shame for the noble religion.
These diehard sinhala racist leaders of the buddhist religion have been and are continuing to be the cause of the ethic problems in the country.They will never allow a political solution to address the reasonable demands of the tamil people. They are a good reason why the tamils need to fight until they achieve their rights. |
hajara50
Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 202 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:41:30 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Mr. Ariyalai (been there 35 years ago, I mean the place),
Please consider me a dunderhead and tell me what you mean by 'equal treatment'. Please let's not go back to 1956, 1983 and so on. Just how do you want SL to treat the tamil sri lankans?
Regards.
|
peacemakerSri
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 730 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:44:42 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Ariyalai_SB
I am not ignorant to make such a remark! Please just examine/compare the 1948 constitution with the current one, then you may be able grasp as to what was on about. It has been well documented not just by many Tamil scholars but by many Sinhalese and foreign thinkers to this effect. If you want to believe that there is no such thing as Sinhala Buddhist Hegemony, please be my guest, but you cannot escape the fact!
Just tell me one instance in the current constitution that discriminate the Tamils?
Those who talk about Sinhala Buddhist Hegemony constitute some sections of Tamil/Sinhalese catholics.
No one can dispute historical influence Buddhism had in Sri Lankan culture. Even our Tamil Hindu kings gave Buddhism it s due place in our history. |
Thalaivar
Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 2145 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:45:17 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Impunity, a debilitating fixture in state culture
25 years after Welikada massacre - by Rajan Hoole
-commemorative Article for Black July 83-
(Lanka-e-News, July 20, 2008, 4.00 PM) Colombo s Welikada high security prison was the scene of two massacres of Tamil political prisoners during the communal violence of July 1983, first after lunch on July 25 claiming 35 prisoners and second, about 4.00 PM on the July 27 claiming a further 18. On both occasions Secretary of Justice Mervyn Wijesinghe asked Colombo Magistrate Keerthi Srilal Wijewardene to hold inquests with the assistance of Tilak Marapone and C.R. de Silva (the present AG) from the Attorney General s Department. No culprits were identified and the case was hushed up.
The massacres made life a living hell also for those on the spot, who driven by moral aversion tried unsuccessfully stop them, but were not even allowed to clear their names.
The inquest
---------------
One of them, Superintendent of Prisons (SP) Alexis Leo de Silva, upon hearing the alarm on the 25th, rushed into the mob in the Chapel Section with ASPs Amarasinghe and Munaweera, followed by Deputy Commissioner (DC) Cutty Jansz, but to little avail. Leo felt very angry that the army unit at the prison headed by Lt. Mahinda Hathurusinghe, 4th Artillery, did nothing to stop the murder, and later also blocked emergency hospitalization of injured survivors. A lieutenant would hardly have dared to override DC Jansz and doomed the survivors, without prompting from Army HQ. While some prison staff protected Tamils, others, including a jailor, attacked the survivors in the compound.
At the inquest on the 26th, Leo wanted to place the truth on record. Magistrate Wijewardene left out chunks of his testimony. Leo s son Lalanath de Silva recently told us, An AG s department counsel called my father outside the room where the inquest was being held and attempted to persuade my father to go along - pleading that the truth would place Sri Lanka in a very adverse position internationally. At one point the Magistrate became so angry that he refused to take down Leo s testimony.
The Police under Detective Superintendent Hyde Silva questioned the survivors on the 26th following the Magistrate s order. To Suriya Wickremasinghe of the Civil Rights Movement belongs the credit for painstakingly seeking out survivors of the massacres, interviewing them and keeping the issue alive. She told us that survivor Manikkadasan in his statement to the Police, blamed two jailors of active complicity. A thin jailor warned him that mention of names might lead to similar jeopardy from inmates.
Edited By - Thalaivar - 20 Jul 2008 11:49:12 GMT |
Thalaivar
Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 2145 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:46:26 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Eyewitnesses
-----------
Suriya believes that the second massacre owed to earlier survivors being also eyewitnesses. On the 27th Lt. Nuvolari Seneviratne of Army Engineers commanded the platoon outside the prison. Hearing a commotion where the survivors had been re-housed, Nuvolari radioed the Duty Officer (DO) at Army HQ. He told the Junior DO who answered that he wanted authority to go into prison and disperse the mob. The Junior DO gave him a telephone number and asked him to phone the DO (a colonel). Nuvolari used the coin phone at the entrance to ring the number at Army HQ. The DO told him to stick to standing orders and stay outside prison, or would face court-martial if he went in. Nuvolari asked for the Army Commander. He was refused, being told the Commander was with President Jayewardene, and relief was being sent to deal with the problem. (Cutty Jansz had also phoned Army HQ.)
The relief, commandos under Major Sunil Peiris, promptly went in and saved 19 of the 37 prisoners. Nuvolari felt the deaths to be sheer murder, which his platoon could have prevented if not constrained by HQ. At the second inquest, the AG s men, Marapone and de Silva, were keenly selective. Leo who was in prison the whole day, had at the first forebodings asked DC Jansz to expedite the removal of the survivors to safety. As if by design, the attack began when he went for a late snack in lieu of lunch, causing him to rush back. Neither he nor his ASPs were called upon to testify at the inquest.
The AG s men and Magistrate tried to frame a jailbreak attempt that supposedly left inadequate resources to prevent the massacre. The AG s men and Army s lawyers importuned Lt. Seneviratne to tell the inquest that he was outside the prison controlling a jailbreak. He refused. The world had crashed around the 22-year-old sportsman from Trinity College who joined the Army with high hopes. Major Sunil Peiris stepped in saying not to harass Nuvolari and if he won t, he won t, and if their object was having someone from the Army testify, he would.
To a leading question, Major Peiris answered with professional precision, I did not notice any prisoners attempting to break out. Therefore I gathered that the attempted mass jail break had been contained before our arrival! Undeterred by Peiris refusal to perjure, the Magistrate summed up, ...prompt and efficient steps taken by the special unit of the Army under witness Major Peiris had effectively prevented the jail break ... and helped quell the mob which might otherwise have caused even greater death
Edited By - Thalaivar - 20 Jul 2008 11:51:21 GMT |
Thalaivar
Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 2145 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:47:59 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Senior prison staff dismissed this as fantasy. I published it in my book Arrogance of Power, since I knew Peiris. I had checked back with Peiris, who, a little hurt, explained, You know your Bible? It was like John the Baptist s head on a charger . It happened before Peiris saw the scene of crime. Peiris action makes sense only if Sepala s utterance, reported also by Kulatunga, drew his attention to something revolting. Peiris testimony at the inquest speaks for truthfulness and accuracy that are hallmarks of a good officer. Nuvolari s refusal to perjure again stands his testimony in good stead.
About when Peiris party arrived, Nuvolari s men drew his attention to a fresh hole in the prison wall near the cricket ground. Upon inspection he saw an Air Force truck standing by. No words were exchanged. The Army s legal unit also removed Nuvolari s standing orders and the logbook with records of vehicles entering. On 27th, the Tamil detainees fought back, some attackers were mauled and soldiers shot some, but there is no account of casualties. SP Leo de Silva felt impelled by his honour to place the truth on record. His later investigations were stalled by an order from Commissioner Delgoda. Then Justice Minister Nissanka Wijeratne threw Leo out of service at the age of 56 by refusing a routine extension. The total cover up and a diversity of coherent testimony pointing to the nefarious deployment of broader resources, gives surely the lie to representing the massacres as an outburst of subaltern patriotism. No perpetrators were named and Sepala walks free. Is it not because they have beans to spill?
Whether or not directly intended, what our commissions and AG s Dept. achieve is to protect the State s inbuilt abuses that have gone over tolerable limits. The blame for its repeated crimes is invariably shuffled off to subaltern sectors. The routine official prevarication also leads to Sinhalese seeing the ethnic problem as Tamils making mountains of molehills, and the solution as being to knock them about, pat them on the head and give them sweets to suck.
Regrettably, few Sinhalese would be shocked that Attorney General C.R. de Silva guides important commission proceedings such as the ACF investigation. He, or Marapone, tried to stop Leo de Silva 25 years ago, pleading that the truth would place Sri Lanka in an adverse position internationally . Lanka would have redeemed itself had all such crimes been faced squarely long ago, rather than make fixers of truth a permanent feature of the State. On a further point, the prison murders of rising Tamil leaders Dr. Rajasundaram, Kuttimani and Thangathurai led to the fracture of the original Tamil youth leadership and the rise of Prabhakaran. That is another intricate story.
In Picture: Dr. Rajasunderam, Mr. Kuttimani and Mr. Thangathurai were among the 52 Tamil political prisoners
Edited By - Thalaivar - 20 Jul 2008 11:52:40 GMT |
Pamela2
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 125 Member Profile
|
20 Jul 2008 11:48:38 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Ariya,
The problem here is you want to have a solution in a single stroke for all the ills we have had .
I can not fathom your Love with Sinhala Buddhist Hegemony , what do you really mean by it
If everyone are to be equal, how about Buddhists should they get the equal no of resources available as Hindus . You can call it what ever you may like such as hegemony ,favoritism end of the day a Government should be able to implement changes . No one should try to appease minority at the expense of majority which is not ethical and practical .
|
|