|
|
JVP attacks fuel price hike
Full News Article
nada
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3076
Member Profile
|
 17 Jan 2008 01:53:13 GMT Report for Abuse
|
CholaPandyan,
The miracle of duttegamunu statue is 100% correct and sadly the sinhala race lives on total deception.
They worship and boast about the same guy whom they earlier branded as a Thushtan (dutte).
Sinhala history is riddled with so many misdeeds and misconceptions but sadly because of the numerical numbers (thanks to the British's Westminister democracy)they are able to distort the whole truth and the whole world.
When he said tamil blood flowing in them is again 100% correct. The sinhala kings always went for tamil queens as they never trusted sinhala women. Also the trustworthy soldiers were tamils, again the Sinhala kings did not trust the sinhalas.
Political adventurism and mischief by so-called scholars have led to this tragic situation where the entire truth remains burried.
Even 'educated men' like Mucha are of the latest tribe with distorted truth and sincerely believe in Sinhala supremacy!!
|
Mucha-linda
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3494
Member Profile
|
17 Jan 2008 02:34:12 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Even 'educated men' like Mucha are of the latest tribe with distorted truth and sincerely believe in Sinhala supremacy!!
UNCLE,
First of all, thanks for recognizing me as an 'educated man'. However, I cannot do the same about the remainder of that statement because what you have done there is the very thing I repeatedly asked you to avoid doing. Mister, this is a public forum and there is no point revealing your opinions if you are not ready to prove those with facts. What you are doing here is expressing what you think about me without standing to provide readers a single evidence to support your view. If you are not ready to defend your view with facts, no one can stop those becoming nothing but your whismical thinking.
For example, you have called me a Sinhala Supermicist. I hereby CHALLENEGE you to give the readers a single evidence to prove that I have act like one. Now mister, what we want here is facts, not another opinion. For example, you cannot prove the opinion that Muchalinda is a Sinhala Supermicist by admitting that I am Chauvinist. Instead, you have to provide facts where I have said things which can be interpretted as racist.
Cheers!!
-Muchalinda
. |
nada
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3076
Member Profile
|
17 Jan 2008 02:54:31 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Mucha,
Even 'educated men' like Mucha are of the latest tribe with distorted truth and sincerely believe in Sinhala supremacy!!
Read what I wrote Mucha sincerely believes in Sinhala supremacy and I did not say that you are one!!
Egs. If I belive in women's rights then that does not mean that I am a woman!
|
p007
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 765
Member Profile
|
 17 Jan 2008 03:01:04 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Bonggo
There you are, P007 clarified it. As 007 he might be having inside information
Ha! ha! ha! So, remember not to dismiss straight away what I say!! |
Mucha-linda
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3494
Member Profile
|
17 Jan 2008 03:28:58 GMT Report for Abuse
|
UNCLE,
Your hesitation to take my challenge is quite understandable. What you are essentially saying here is that I am not a Sinhala Supermicist (i.e. I have never acted like a Sinhala Supermicist), but I believe in Sinhala Supremacy. I wonder how did you come to know that I am believing in Sinhala Supremacy when I have not acted like one. Do you have the ability to read minds (Parachiththa Vijanana Gnanaya as called in Buddhism)?
Asusuch UNCLE, I would not still not mind demanding you to provide any evidence to the effect that I have believed in Sinhala Supremacy.
Good luck.
-Mucha.
Edited By - Mucha-linda - 17 Jan 2008 03:34:14 GM |
Shakti
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3565
Member Profile
|
 17 Jan 2008 03:54:27 GMT Report for Abuse
|
P007,
DUNF was Lalith's breakaway UNP
Sorry, I got the name mixed up. But in 1988 Sirima had some sort of alliance that started with Democratic... (can?t remember the name. It was never formally registered and died after the election failure)
When it comes to politics, I pay more attention on trends, rather than individuals, so miss these trivia. But there are people who remember trivia very well.
.
|
p007
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 765
Member Profile
|
17 Jan 2008 04:06:01 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Shakti
When it comes to politics, I pay more attention on trends, rather than individuals, so miss these trivia. But there are people who remember trivia very well.
Trends are created by individuals. Some trends last, some don't. Some individuals are real Colossus and are remembered long after they have gone like Ghandhi, Nehru, Abe Lincoln, Nelson Mandela and so many others.
There are local heroes as well. How can you regard the trends important and dismiss the individuals who create the trends as trivia?
|
Bonggo
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8300
Member Profile
|
 17 Jan 2008 05:21:57 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Shakti & P007,
Nevertheless, we have had a little diversion here.
My contention was the JVP was a beneficiary of the 1982 Referendum rather than a victim. Furthermore, if JR did not change the Constitution we would not have seen any JVP Member of Parliament today.
|
Shakti
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3565
Member Profile
|
17 Jan 2008 05:52:37 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Bongoo,
My contention was the JVP was a beneficiary of the 1982 Referendum rather than a victim. Furthermore, if JR did not change the Constitution we would not have seen any JVP Member of Parliament today.
It is difficult to say, but if JRJ conducted the 1983 general elections under the new representative system JVP could have got one or two seats, and that would have prevented them taking arms for the second time. So I cannot really say JVP was a beneficiary of the 82 referendum. More a victim because they lost their voice almost.
New-JVP (post 94) was definitely a beneficiary of 78 constitution.
.
|
p007
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 765
Member Profile
|
17 Jan 2008 06:18:30 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Bonggo
Furthermore, if JR did not change the Constitution we would not have seen any JVP Member of Parliament today.
If you mean the Constitution he fathered in 1978, no argument on that. If you mean the Amendment to the 1978 Constitution which reduced the cut off to 5%, the credit must go to Premadasa and, also, Ashroff who really asked for it. |
|
Search All News and Discussions