|
|
US stresses need for power sharing
Full News Article
AnuD
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10421
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 14:44:55 GMT Report for Abuse
|
I think a viable power sharing package is a necessary.
This is just a vague statement.
What do you have in mind ?. |
AnuD
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10421
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 14:47:42 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Hashini:
I don't think India is secular as much as they use the name or that word. I lived in the country. There is alot of annymosity if you are not a hindu.
Human rights, Equality AS WELL as SECULAR are political words.
Politically India is a secular country. Indian govt openly does not support any religion.
So, you need to understand first what SeCULAR is. |
EEELamaya
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 647
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 14:48:29 GMT Report for Abuse
|
AnuD:
I understand you getting your foolish ass fired up by my comment... you stupid think USA, UK, Sweeden, and Sri Lanka are same?
Your stupid SL govt made Buddhism the state religion... your stupid President and state gives special previledges to Buddhists... monks get Mercides Benzes donated by state... the state money is everybody's money... especially the estate Tamils make a huge contribution to the state coppers... then you morons have the corrage to use that money to foster Buddhism.. and hurt all other religions, there by...
You Shingala fools have created all this mess in Sri Lanka..!
Edited By - EEELamaya - 10 Mar 2007 14:52:16 GMT |
tigeress19
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6715
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 14:49:52 GMT Report for Abuse
|
I think a viable power sharing package is a necessary.
This is just a vague statement.
What do you have in mind ?.
stop being silly again anud.
what MANN meant is ,that a political package must be a one the ltte can agree which will lead to lasting peace!
hard to comprehend? |
Srilankan1
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 281
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 14:51:07 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Anud,
I was Asking. Which means i don't know. And i wanted to know. |
Saint
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3300
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 14:51:56 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Guys we have news on apprentice, on a new thread.
;-) |
AnuD
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10421
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 14:54:59 GMT Report for Abuse
|
SriLanka1:
I was Asking. Which means i don't know. And i wanted to know.
I took it wrong, I suppose. I apologize. |
JRJayawardena
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2965
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 14:55:14 GMT Report for Abuse
|
SL1,
My Question is isn't it similar to introvation and practise of using pleasure areas on your mind ?
Interesting questioning. But before answeing questions on this I need to ensure whether you have read any of the 'Tipitaka' to answer or enquire your interest in introversion. Tripitaka or Tipitaka as in Pali is the collection of 3 text books of the Teravada Buddhism. They are 'Vinaya Pitaka', 'Sutta Pitaka' and 'Abhidhamma Pitaka'.
Out of these 3 pitakas 'Abhidhamma' is the pitaka you need to read to comprehend the mantal states and thoughts of ones perception. Mind and thought are two things that go in tandem but could take plunges upon action; in order to realise this phenomenon you need to read and comprehend 'Abhidhamma'. If you have not associated it in detailed I'll recommend you to buy a basic Principles of Abhidhamma' and associate it.
Alternatively I have quoted a web page for you to get some insight what it is like an explanation.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/abhi/index.html
I also want you to read deep down abhidhamma to assimilate any doubts that you have on human mind and thoughts processes. It may take some time but make free time to do so, as its fully worth in indulging.
I can recommend some of the basic Buddhist Books if you are interested in; written by Rev. Prof. Rerukane Chandawimala Thero. As you can see one in Red is basic concepts of Abhidhamma. Hope I have been of help to you. Nice to know you are interested in this area.
I also have some picture in my space on below link;
http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2007/2/12502_space.html
JRJ |
JRJayawardena
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2965
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 15:05:28 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Eelamaya,
I am fine how are you buddy?
Now on the question about Monks and Buddhism and Christianity and others. I think we need not mix everything to make a hotchpotch. As I have mentioned to SL1 Buddhism is a religion that needs intelligent people with patience and digestive power not emotional people who create unwanted publicity over petty racial, religious or class issue. Whether that implies racism or communalism remains to be talked through.
For every religion there are fundamentalists and fanatics. To say the least we should not mix them together as mentioned before.
The counttry needs peace and Sri Lanka predominantly being a Buddhist country monks take precedence for that matter and that does not mean to create tension and intricacies among non-Buddhist of course.
JRJ |
hashini
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1099
Member Profile
|
10 Mar 2007 15:16:12 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| In my mind A VIABLE POWER SHARING is NOT what LTTE wants but what Tamils want. That means the power to bring LTTE, Karuna, TULF, EPDP everybody to the table and finding out what TAMILS want, not what LTTE wants. Most tamil dispora may support LTTE but not in within the SLn soil. There are many fractions. That would be a viable solution. I also have understood that what LTTE want is not necessarily what tamils want. It depends from region to region. Tamils from east to north, to the south to the west are different. Catholic community is different from the hindu community. Their concerns and needs are different. I think a viable solution of power sharing is actually when all are addressed including the muslims and the burgers, they might not want to be under a political solution that is beneficial to the sinhala and tamil community without their say. It is a long road we have waisted 30 years so few more years won't hurt if we sincerely want an answer but I doubt it. |
|
Search All News and Discussions