|
|
President calls for goodwill from LTTE
Full News Article
JaceDMace Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 1078 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 08:41:19 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Why do you think the Tamils should choose a sinhalese (King) leader in the south.. Tamils votes had been robbed by many previous leaders and then unleashed the state terror on the very people who elected them.. so as Tamils from NE they have nothing to do with your leader, they dont represent the Tamils only the south Sinhala interest.
It is not for you, or VP or the LTTE to decide what the tamil people want. What right does Praba have to control them or decide their future? Was he voted into this position?
We are all clear Eelam does not exist. Like it or not the N E is part of Sri Lanka for now/or forever depending.
The plantation tamils were disenfranchised for a long period of time till they were rightly made citizens of the country and have a say in it's running. The Govt. at the time was wrong to do this
So like I said, like it or not, till (or if ever) Eelam is ever created, what you hero did, was to similarly disenfranchise these people.
Tell me my friend - if the GOSL had done that, and not allowed the Tamils in the NE to vote, you would have cried blue muder.
Yet, when VP removed the Tamils fundmental right as Sri Lankans (till Eelam is created or not) you are willing to bend over and take it up the ass and say 'thank you'?
Why the contradiction? Edited By - JaceDMace - 21 Sep 2006 08:42:57 GMT |
sansare Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 5145 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 08:45:16 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Lokuttara;
The Q is why not you ask the GOSL to implement the CFA or get rid of it??
Yes, I agree CFA is good to make calm NE. But, solution must be further down the road.
If GOSL implement CFA, its bit more easy to manage it as sea tigers are not to challenge it now. |
tigeress19 Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 13596 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 08:55:14 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Pera
i think, it is purely a tactical withdrawal, if you want to take that the ltte is lost, I'm fine with it. the ltte is fighting with the sla a conventional war not a guerrilla type war right now, but the gosl should be care full not to push the ltte to turn as a guerrilla out fit which they know better compare to conventional.
why TRO was banned? i do not know pera but any think possible in SL against the tamils. |
mohamednisfer
Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 66 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 08:57:20 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Mohamed
what is your message mahamed?
are you trying to say the ltte should put their arms down?
Tigeress19,
Well, my msg was to you: don't believe in mirages (VP & Co).
that's all my dear friend. |
tigeress19 Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 13596 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 08:57:34 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Sansare
agreed, CFA must hold and further negotiations needed to strengthen the agreed CFA to reach a final solution sooner the better regardless of who and which govt signed. |
vimaljp
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 49 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 09:05:29 GMT Report for Abuse
|
JACE,
who is this clown??? Dixit bribed by the GOSL? New one that.. So the LTTE turning their guns against the the IPKF had nothing to do with it?
People who see the issues at the surface level never get to know what actually happened.Refer info related to RAW and interview of HarkiratSingh the then General of India for SL operations.
The Master plan of GoSL and IPKF turning against LTTE:
When Dixit's duty was to convey the happenings of SL to Rajeev (Then Indian PM), he never done that,instead when LTTE and IPKF Head were in talks often DIXIT issued orders to IPKF head to shoot VP and its associates there by finishing LTTE in crooked way in larger ineterests of GoSL(jayawardane) and and the treats offered by them.He was never true convoy of India but acted as a rep of SL and gave false information to the then PM of India about LTTE and made rajeev(PM) to sign agreement between SL and India with out consulting LTTE.In the ineterest of GoSL he urged the Indian PM to declare disarmament of LTTE.Then when Thileepans fast started and when great tensions were escalated in SL ,Dixit did not convey the message to the PM, he biased the news and again give false info to rajeev, so Rajeev was convinced by Dixit that nothing is happening(Thileepans fast) in SL.So Rajeev did not respond to Thileepans fast.Then thileepan died.LTTE got anger to IPKF.Again the GOSL officials asked the 17 LTTE's to their custody from IPKF.Though the IPKF head was not willing hand over, this man dixit convinced the Army general of India to order IPKF head to hand over 17 LTTE's to SLA.Then 17 LTTE died and the water gone beyond the head LTTE got anger and Killed 6 IPKF men.
Very Soon this Dixit convinced Rajeev to change the IPKF head(Harkirat) and he was reacalled to India.Later Another head who obeys the order of Dixit was appointed and started fighting against LTTE.
Rajeev belived what Dixit Said.Dixit turned IPKF as traitors and IPKF was there by turned against LTTE.
So Do you understand how the bribing of Dixit(Misguided Rajeev against LTTE in the intereest of SL) turned the history.
For EELamaya,
Later GoSL and SLA were afraid that Indian army would dominate and Overpower the GOSL and SLA.So they had to sent them back.Ltte ofcourrse wants them sent back.Later is LTTE'S strategy to sign agreement with premadasa to get rid of IPKF.Tigers succeeded, premadasa payed for it.
In that turning IPKF against LTTE was GoSL's sucess and strategy,Senting them back to India with premadasa and finishing Premadasa is LTTE's Sucess and strategy. |
Lokuttara
Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 512 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 09:06:47 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Jace
It is not for you, or VP or the LTTE to decide what the tamil people want. What right does Praba have to control them or decide their future? Was he voted into this position?
what is the thing with the oppressors that they want to choose the freedom fighters and leaders for the Tamils?? The fact is more than 90% of all Tamils support the LTTE.. no African voted Mandela to be an ANC freedom fighter, when the freedom came he was elected by the people.. so let us talk about the democracy and electing a Tamil leader when the people are free..
Tell me my friend - if the GOSL had done that, and not allowed the Tamils in the NE to vote, you would have cried blue muder.
C?on dont just kid ya self Jace.. LTTE did not give its blessing to elect a Sinhala leader(king), and as a NE Tamil a sinhala president means nothing for him. The Tamils have voted when it was relevant for them to choose there representatives locally. LTTE has not forced anyone NOT to vote.. if that so why the Jaffna under GOSL control did not see any Tamils voting to elect a Sinhala Prez???
Why the contradiction?
We don?t see any contradiction in here.. It?s the Tamils rights to choose who represent them (locally) but choosing a Sinhala king I don?t think the Tamils in the NE are interested? |
tigeress19 Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 13596 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 09:11:11 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Mohamed
do not believe in VP & co
should i take the word of gosl Mohamed? kathir,anandasangary, Douglas are all for federal and are govt puppets.
have they archived anything for the Tamils? or have they raised any concerns of tamils? a big NO.
Mohamed, the govt do not need ltte or its consent to address the Tamil grievances, if it is sincere.
knowing ,kathir's ,sangary's and D devandas plight ,where do i draw the line between the ltte and gosl? |
vimaljp
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 49 Member Profile
|
21 Sep 2006 09:11:13 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Jace
Tell me my friend - if the GOSL had done that, and not allowed the Tamils in the NE to vote, you would have cried blue muder.
If GoSL does there is no doubt that it is blue murder.coz its agoverment.
But if VP does its an agitation against the goverment at their own will to make the goverment to hear the people's voice
Understand it |
|