|
|
Kfir mishap averted
Full News Article
SenaM
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1908
Member Profile
|
 25 Feb 2007 17:05:52 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Incidentally, the HF-24 could have been a major 'success- story' for HAL .. it could have rivalled the Russian MIG-21 as a 'world-beater' in its class .. and as an 'export success'. But Dr Kurt Tank was 'muzzled' from the start by the US and UK .. which with-held the kind of engine he wanted for the Program. If the UK/US Govts had agreed to allow an engine like the R-R Avon to be supplied, it could have been a 'fabulous' aircraft. It was intended to have Mach 2 performance .. like the MIG-21 .. and in the same weight class as the current HAL TEJA/Light Combat Aircraft.
(As it was, Dr Tank had to be satisfied with the low-powered 'Orpheus' engine - installing two of them to make-up for needed power .. not really what he was seeking for the HF-24).
Same story with Dr Kurt Tank's PUCARA development .. produced for FMA (Firma Militaire Argentine). He wanted the US engine, Garrett TPE-331 for the program .. but it was denied. He had to settle for the less reliable Turbomeca Astazou XV1G, which I believe affected its export potential, severely.
Edited By - SenaM - 26 Feb 2007 23:48:24 GMT |
Dinuk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 272
Member Profile
|
 25 Feb 2007 18:11:43 GMT Report for Abuse
|
SenaM,
Thanks For The Valuable Post regarding HAL Tejas and Marut..
I've Got Another question for you.. isn't It Cheaper to Overhaul MIG 27 in India than sending them to Ukraine? Is there any Enhancements in MIG27ML (Bahadur) than Ukranian built Mig27s? I mean Example like In Avionics?
Cheers!
Edited By - Dinuk - 25 Feb 2007 18:15:50 GMT |
SenaM
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1908
Member Profile
|
25 Feb 2007 18:57:22 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Dinuk
The MIG-27 is a development of the MIG-23, which was intended to be a long-range interceptor (much like the US F-111 , 'swing-wing' aircraft). Interceptor means 'air- superiority' .. it must be able to 'out-fight' and win against other (enemy) aircraft. However, soon it was found important to incorporate a 'ground attack' capability into the aircraft .. and the MIG-27 version came into being. (Mig-27M would indicate the kinds of sensors, and other weapons guidance equipment found in the aircraft).
The MIG-27ML is the export version of the MIG-27M. SLAF a'cft are MIG-27MLs produced in the Ukraine. HAL has been building MIG-27MLs under license for some time, for the IAF .. and may now have necessary authority from their Russian principal for export of same.
It may well be cheaper to get our -27MLs overhauled in India .. the problem is Indian sensitivity to undertaking such work for the Sri Lanka Govt. I believe HAL is not anxious to Tender for such work .. (Possible, it may become an 'issue' in the Indian Parliament .. if so, it would tend to 'polarise' (divide) an other-wise cohesive partner-ship in the 'ruling' majority. They would not like that ..)
Edited By - SenaM - 25 Feb 2007 19:37:53 GMT |
Dinuk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 272
Member Profile
|
26 Feb 2007 03:22:29 GMT Report for Abuse
|
SenaM,
Thanks For Enlighten Me. :-) So Thats Why We Using MIG23UBs As Trainers Along With MIG27Ms. Maybe Because It Sharing The Same Basic Airframe. Interesting! Thanks Again!
Cheers! |
KfirC2
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 682
Member Profile
|
26 Feb 2007 05:35:50 GMT Report for Abuse
|
SLN getting another OPC....
Sunday Paper the Nation
http://www.nation.lk/2007/02/25/newsfe3.htm
[The Sri Lankan Navy has repeatedly called for joint surveillance with the Indian Navy, but to no avail. But there is increased military cooperation between the two governments, and towards this end India will either grant or lease a coast guard vessel to the Sri Lanka Navy. The Nation reliably learns that the Offshore Petrol craft (OPC) Varaha will be released to Sri Lanka by the Indian government in the near future. The Indian Coast Guard Ship (CGS) Varaha was in service in Sri Lanka while the Indian build SLNS Sayura was undergoing refurbishment in India.
SLNS Sayura the flagship of the Sri Lanka navy was bought from India in 2001. Formally known as Indian Navy?s Ship (INS) Saryu, the OPC was taken over by the SL navy to increase its blue water capability, especially in the light of confronting LTTE weapons smuggling vessels. Later another OPC was added to the fleet when the US Coast Guard vessel, Courageous was donated to Sri Lanka. It was refurbished and mounted with a weapons system in the United States and commissioned as SLNS Samudura. If the grant is carried through by the Indian government, CGS Varaha will be the third such vessel in the possession of the Navy with a deep sea capability. All three vessels (Sayura, Samudura and Varaha) have the ability to carry one or two helicopters on board and leave the option open for the establishment of the naval air wing, which has been put off on several previous occasions due to monetary considerations. CGS Varaha is a Vikram class OPC which was commissioned in 1992. At the time of construction it was designed to be in service for 20 years till 2012. However, after some modifications the vessel is expected to be in service for approximately 26 years.
The wear and tear of Coast Guard ships is greater since they stay longer at sea and cruise faster when involved in a chase. Therefore, their lifespan is shorter than other naval assets of similar size. The 75 metre length ship requires a crew of 100 including 11 officers. It can reach a top speed of 22 knots while having a range of 8500 nautical miles.
Interestingly, Sri Lankan military cooperation between its vital regional allies seems to be differentiated on specific needs. While Indian assistance has mainly focused on the maritime defence area, Pakistan has been involved in improving the capabilities of the Sri Lanka Air Force.
This week a high level Pakistan delegation, led by Defence Secretary Lieutenant General (Retired) Tariq Waseem Ghazi, visited the Ministry of Defence in Colombo on Monday February 19. |
GreyFox
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1358
Member Profile
|
26 Feb 2007 10:05:50 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| OPVs are the solution for an efficient navy that can patrol the seas economically. Good to see the SL gov finally getting it together and moving in the right direction. |
ThinKing
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10265
Member Profile
|
 26 Feb 2007 10:53:50 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Eksath,
I defer with your last comment. He served the country for his entire career and rose to the top. As a flag officer he is well qualified to be a critic of a democracy that he has served his entire professional life AND a war he has lost a son to. There are not too many southern leaders who can say that.
A soldier who wants peace is not a traitor or threat.
Mate, I dont think I called Harry G. a traitor. What I was talking about was the damage he did in relation to the posting of SenaM and his(HG's) Analysis on SL military politico situations to local/foreign media.
I have no objection about being critical of GoSL and infact I would be more than happy if he could make a change in that sense(which is wishfull thinking I guess anyway ;) )
I have no idea about his career(qualifications, promotions..etc), so I'll not comment on that. But I will agree with SenaM's comment on that. |
Eksath
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 468
Member Profile
|
1 Mar 2007 18:06:14 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Breaking news guys.
PT-6 Down
Air Force PT-6 Trainer Air Craft Crashes Killing Two
1 Mar 2007 - 21:43
ANURADHAPURA: THE AIR FORCE HAS APPOINTED A SPECIAL COMMITTEE to conduct a detailed investigation into the incident.
Air Forces authorities said the victims of the crashed trainer craft PT-06 are Flight Lieutenant LAKSHIKA MUTHUKUMARANA (30) instructor and Officer Cadet (trainee) CHATHURA BANADARA ILANGAKOON (23).
ThinKing,
You are right. you did not call him a traitor. Can you point me to this plagarism you mention. I ma not aware of any of that. Thanks! |
SenaM
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1908
Member Profile
|
1 Mar 2007 23:27:09 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Can you point me to this plagarism you mention ..
Some-time ago in a news-paper account, AVM H Goonetilake tried to take credit for the PL-2 Project .. when all he did was 'wrap it up' .. giving the Program a 'quick death', after taking as much credit as possible, for him-self. The PL-2 had its public debut at a ceremonial parade at SLAF Base China Bay .. where it was formally presented to the then President of Sri Lanka, Hon J R Jayawardene. On this occasion AVM Goonetilake took great pains to try to 'get across' to the President, that this was very much 'his Project'. He saw to it that others who had a great deal more to do with it were kept 'out of view' ..
AVM Goonetilake was not the 'originator'of the Project .. it was begun in AVM PH Mendis's time, and the initiative came from Wg Cdr Marasinghe .. it was he who wrote to Laszlo Pazmany for the PL-2 Set of Plans, obtained necessary authority for constructing the marque, chose a responsible leader (S/L Guneratnam) and 'crew' to build the first aircraft, got necessary approval for funds, materiel, components and an engine for the program (in fact took the decision to depart from Pazmany's plans, and select the Continental O-200 in place of the Lycoming O-235 .. as there was no possiblity of 'getting' the 'prescribed' engine for the project) .. and much more. All of this was done by him, when he was Senior Technical Officer (STO) at the Katunayake Base.
In order to be the 'focus' of attention at the formal aircraft presentation, AVM Goonetilake had a special Musketry Training Course (range firing) arranged for a group of Senior Officers including Wg Cdr Marasinghe .. at SLAF Diyatalawa .. to coincide with the PL-2 debut at China Bay. Thus, Wg Cdr Marasinghe, who had very much to do with the Program was 'kept out' from the formal PL-2 Presentation. Another notable absentee on this occasion was AVM P H Mendis (then retired). He should have been present, as the Aircraft Construction Project was commenced during his time, and with his 'blessings' ..
But 'Harry G' had to be the 'Star' of this event, and what credit he could get was all that mattered .. the larger perspective of all that the Program stood for, was of no cosequence .. It would be true to say, that he has been an arrogant, selfish, and petty-minded person .. also a plagiarist.
Edited By - SenaM - 2 Mar 2007 22:49:12 GMT |
Saervek
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 102
Member Profile
|
2 Mar 2007 05:40:41 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Here is another interesting article...
http://www.dailynews.lk/2007/03/02/news31.asp
?We also had fruitful discussions with two Chinese Companies CMC and CRC to have a factory to produce compartments locally,? Minister Alahapperuma added.
According to Minister Alahapperuma Railway Department is spending US $ 2.1 million for one compartment and if Government is successful in establishing this factory in Sri Lanka a large sum of foreign exchange can be saved.
Smart move. This should probably have been done years ago, but better late than never. Starting with rolling stock (sans locomotive) is a good idea... We could probably cast the body, glass, furnishings etc already anyway... Just acquire the capability to manufacture the undercarriage... After that you could undertake a similar procedure to manufacture the locomotives... |
|
Search All News and Discussions