|
|
Kfir mishap averted
Full News Article
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
9 Feb 2010 12:55:43 GMT Report for Abuse
|
AgustaWestland has also set up a local subsidiary and support centre in Malaysia. Like Sikorsky, it is also involved in partnerships in Japan and South Korea. Eurcopter has nine subsidiaries in the Asia-Pacific region, and will open its tenth in the first half of this year.
'We are opening one subsidiary in the region every year, and two or three MRO centres in Asia every year,' says Ducrot, who declines to reveal where the tenth subsidiary will be.
Eurocopter now has subsidiaries in Indonesia, Japan, the Philippines, Singapore and South Korea, among others.
Even as the helicopter market continues to grow in Asia Pacific, manufacturers have highlighted concerns about training and infrastructure in the region.
For one, the air infrastructure is not uniform across the region. Australia, Japan and South Korea are well developed, while China and India are 'well-positioned for explosive growth', says Sikorsky. The other countries fall somewhere in between, it adds.
PILOT SHORTAGES
A shortage of trained pilots is also a problem. AgustaWestland is aiming to combat this by offering training services from its facility at Subang airport through its Malaysian subsidiary, and has provided full-flight simulators outside the region to international customers for the AW109 Power and AW139.
Eurocopter's Ducrot says there is a need for more trained pilots in Asia Pacific. 'This is especially so in India and China,' he says.
Eurocopter has partnered governments and the private sector to set up simulators in the region, he adds. The company's subsidiary in Malaysia has partnered the Malaysia International Aerospace Centre to build a helicopter centre in Subang, which will hold a full-flight simulator for the EC227/725. Training is due to start by the end of 2011.
'We have to contribute what we can to help train more pilots in the region,' says Ducrot.
|
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
12 Feb 2010 02:03:34 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Mistral class amphibious assault ship to Russia.
France became the first NATO member in history to sell offensive arms to Russia, agreeing on the sale of a Mistral class amphibious assault ship worth around 500 million euros. In addition, and despite concerns expressed by its American and eastern European allies, France is considering selling three more ships to Russia, as stated by Jacques de Lajugie, head of international sales at the French defence ministry.
The 23,000 tonne Mistral class ship will significantly boost the strength of Russia s ageing fleet. The amphibious assault ship, which can be used as a command vessel, can carry sixteen attack helicopters, 70 vehicles including thirteen battle tanks, and up to 900 troops for thousands of miles.
US Defence Secretary Robert Gates, who was visiting Paris yesterday, said he was deeply concerned . Six American senators, including John McCain, had already sent a letter to the French ambassador in Washington asking him to stop the sale. Other NATO members are also uneasy about the deal, concerned by the prospect of increasing Russia s force projection capabilities in the aftermath of its crushing victory over the Georgian military in 2008.
-------------------------
From a geopolitical perspective, the eastern European states concerns are well-founded. With the procurement of a Mistral vessel, and with several more in the pipeline, Moscow greatly increases its strategic range. Admiral Vladimir Vysotskiy, the Russian navy's commander-in-chief, has said that such a ship would have allowed Russia to land all the troops it deployed during the Russia-Georgia conflict in 40 minutes, rather than the 26 hours it took in 2008.
Russian officials responded to international anxiety by hastening to suggest more peaceful uses for the Mistral ship, such as humanitarian relief and anti-piracy operations, but it is its undeniable offensive capacity that will dominate debate. Countries on the Black Sea and Caspian are likely to pursue counter-moves, with Romania's recent accepted of an American missile defence shield a case in point. |
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
12 Feb 2010 02:06:52 GMT Report for Abuse
|
The Baltic states are no less concerned. A Mistral-class vessel could just as well be deployed in the Baltic Sea, evidenced by the port-call of the French mistral at St Petersburg last November. Wedged between Russia and the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad, and having gained independence from the Soviet bloc less than 20 years ago, the Baltic states feel chronically insecure. Added to which are the problems posed by Russian minorities in the Baltic states, who have too often been pawns in the struggle between a Russia reluctant to relinquish control and the new states' assertion of nationalist independence. Putin s did little to allay fears, responding that if purchased, he 'will use it wherever deemed necessary. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithunia have said they feel alarmed by the consequences of the deal for their national security, and have asked France to reconsider.
The French president Nicolas Sarkozy has defended the sale in the framework of an emerging Franco-Russian strategic partnership . Sarkozy said that the sale did not pose a problem, since Russia should be treated as a real partner. Herv Morin, France s defence minister, claimed suggested critics still talking in anachronistic cold war terms. However, while the French publicly dismiss the spheres-of-influence thinking inherited from the cold war, and claim that their dealings with Russia should not be seen as a geopolitical threat to any country, the Mistral visiting St. Petersburg in November 2009 curiously resembles a Franco-Russian naval event in St. Petersburg in 1891. This moment of great power summitry marked the start of the official Franco-Russian alliance and was a high point of balance-of-power politics, contributing to the series alliances frequently blamed for the outbreak of the first world war.
The dubious strategic rationale for the deal led the French foreign ministry to oppose it, Le Monde reported. The paper suggested Fran ois Fillon, France s prime minister, pushed the deal mainly because of its economic benefits. The order would give a huge boost to the Saint-Nazaire naval shipyards and for the French domestic defence industry, providing critical funds and job creation opportunities. Fillon has emerged as a key supporter in France of the rapprochement with Russia, both for its purported strategic benefits and for its lucrative business opportunities. In a 2008 NATO summit, for example, he publicly opposed Georgian and Ukrainian membership plans. |
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
12 Feb 2010 02:10:35 GMT Report for Abuse
|
The French move also testify to the difficulty Europe has in its foreign policy approach to Russia. Moscow delights in playing off different EU member states against each other, and European countries find it difficult to present a united front, for example in external policies such as energy supply security. The Lisbon Treaty was intended to improve the cohesiveness of Europe s external policies but little has been achieved in this regard while France appears to be circumventing EU coordination and consultation procedures in the Mistral sale.
Even in Russia itself, the deal has been subject to criticism. The declining Russian defence industry has argued strongly against arms imports, and has asked why Russia should finance jobs for French workers. Accounting for such pressures, Russia first intended to buy one Mistral along with a license to build the next ships in Russian shipyards. However, yesterday s announcement that all ships will be constructed in France seems to indicate that at present, the Russian defence industry is incapable of providing the necessary capability to construct an advanced vessel such as the Mistral, even with the help of French technology transfers. More contested international arms deals should be expected. |
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
12 Feb 2010 02:17:01 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Hmmmmmm..... link problems again :(
Edited By - Jolyroger - 12 Feb 2010 02:23:32 GMT |
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
12 Feb 2010 22:44:01 GMT Report for Abuse
|
India s Ballistic Missile Defence programme is more
sophisticated than China s.
An Indian scientist has claimed that this country s Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) programme is more sophisticated than China s.
Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) Director Dr VK Saraswat said on Wednesday night that India's anti-ballistic missile defence programme is ahead of China's programme. The country is gearing to test its indigenous BMD shield in near future.
'This is one area where we are senior to China,' he said when asked to compare the Indian BMD programme with that of China, which carried out its first test-firing on January 14.
He said the Indian programme had started in 2006 and had 60-70 per cent indigenous content in it.
Dr Saraswat said Indian BMD development programme would have two phases. 'In the first phase, which goes upto 2,000 km range, we will carry out exo-atmospheric, endo-atmospheric and high-altitude interceptions and in the second phase, we will take care of targets beyond 5,000 km range,' he explained.
He expected the test of the BMD shield to be carried out within this month.
He was talking to reporters here on the recent test firing of Agni-III missile, which has strike range of 3500 k.m and is now ready for induction in the armed forces. |
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
12 Feb 2010 22:47:31 GMT Report for Abuse
|
India has completed the propulsion system design of its new cruise missile Nirbhay which will have a strike range of 800 kms, Dr Saraswat said.
'The development of the system is on. We have completed the propulsion system s design. But we have not integrated it. Once we reach the integration stage, we will show it you,' he told reporters.
Dr Saraswat said the missile is a technology demonstrator.
India already has in its arsenal BrahMos , a 300-k.m. range cruise missile developed in collaboration with Russia. It has various versions for use by all the three wings of the armed forces.
Dr Saraswat announced that Sunday's test of the Agni- III missile will clear the decks for the induction of the missile into the services.
The test, carried out by Strategic Forces Command, sets the stage for the induction of nuclear-tipped missile.
China had only one missile in the 2500-km category, the DF-21, and is now focused only on building intercontinental range missiles (ICBMs) of the DF-31 and DF-41 in the 6000- 10,000 km range.
'But our accuracies are better than the Chinese missiles,' Dr Saraswat claimed.
China, in January 2007, had displayed its anti-ballistic missile capabilities while knocking out a disused satellite in space. This was the world's first declared A-SAT test.
Earlier in January, the Chinese declared that they had successfully tested a ground-based mid-range anti ballistic missile.
'China only had the building blocks for an ATBM,' Dr Saraswat maintained.
'We started our ATBM programme in 1999 and in terms of capabilities, we are way ahead of them,' he added.
Dr.Saraswat said India had perfected the building blocks for an A-SAT weapon but there were no plans to field any such system. |
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
13 Feb 2010 01:41:51 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Thailand deports five aircrew.
The five-man crew of the aircraft carrying weapons from North Korea to Ukraine via Sri Lanka have been deported to their home countries on Friday after Thailand's Office of the Attorney-General (OAG) dropped all charges against them on Thursday.
The crew pilot Mikhail Petukjou, 54 from Belarus and Alexandr Zrybnev, 53, Viktor Abdullayev, 58, Vitaliy Shumkov, 54, and Ilyas Issakov, 53, all from Kazakhstan have been deported to their respective countries.
All of them were taken from the Bangkok Remand Prison to the Immigration Bureau pending for deportation procedures.
Their passports had been stamped 'persona non grata' showing that they could endanger the country's security.
They were then transfered to Suvarnabhumi Airport and departed Thailand via Kazakhstan's Air Astana at 5.45 pm.
The Thai Immigration officials accompanied them on the flight to Astana to hand over the crew to Kazakhstani and Belarussian officials as requested by the two countries.
OAG Special Cases Division director-general Thanapit Moonlapruek on Thursday said the agency dropped all charges against the crew as prosecuting them was not in Thailand's national interest, and would negatively affect the good relations existing between Thailand, Belarus and Kazakhstan.
He said the OAG concluded that the arms found in the plane were not intended for use in Thailand as they had landed in Bangkok only to refuel before continuing to their intended destination. In addition, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution Number 1874 (2009) did not stipulate any legal action to be taken against the crew.
Moreover, the governments of Belarus and Kazakhstan had submitted letters through Thailand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs requesting the temporary release of the crew to face investigation in their home countries.
Their Russian-made plane refuelled at Don Mueang airport on December 12 enroute from North Korea to Ukraine, via Sri Lanka.
After searching, the Thai authorities found that new, ready-to-use military weapons including explosives, rocket-propelled grenades, components for surface-to-air missiles and other armaments totally weighing some 35 tonnes, were carried on the aircraft.
The five men were arrested and charged with carrying military weapons without permission, illegally bringing them to Thailand and failing to inform officials of their items.
First charged with illegal arms possession, the crew denied knowing anything about what they were carrying. They said they thought it was oil exploration gear rather that the anti-aircraft 'SAM' surface-to-air missile parts, shoulder-launched anti-tank RPG grenades, and other explosives rather that oil-drilling equipment.
The shipment breached the UN Security Council resolution which bans North Korea from exporting arms and weapons-related material.
The Thai government has informed the United Nations over the impounded weapons. |
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
13 Feb 2010 01:59:00 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Presidents of Russia, Sri Lanka agree on oil prospecting and arms.
Sri Lanka is becoming one of Russia's priority South Asian partners, although the island nation has long been far from the focus of Russia's economic interests in the region.
Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa proposed a cooperative development effort in offshore oil and gas projects to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. Sources close to the talks said the two countries signed a $300 million loan agreement. Russia will loan the money to Sri Lanka to buy Russian military equipment.
According to the Sri Lankan government, there are eight oil and gas blocks in the Mannar basin off the northwestern coast. Until recently, the region was controlled by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a separatist terrorist group that sought an independent state in northern areas in Sri Lanka inhabited by ethnic Tamils the LTTE was defeated in May 2009.
Sri Lankan oil and gas fields have never been explored. The island's energy sector mainly involves biomass fuel production, which accounts for 48% of local consumption. Imported oil accounts for 44%.
Russia's energy giant Gazprom will take part in oil prospecting and later in the development of Sri Lankan oil. President Rajapaksa, who is on a state visit to Moscow, held discussions on Monday with Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller at the company's headquarters. No details of the agreements they reached have been disclosed.
The $300 million loan agreement signed during Rajapaksa's visit was a real breakthrough in the two countries' relations. Sri Lanka will draw the money over five years and repay it in ten years. The purpose of the loan is to buy armaments and dual-purpose technology for Sri Lanka's military, Russian Deputy Finance Minister Dmitry Pankin said.
A source at state arms exporter Rosoboronexport said Sri Lanka will purchase Russian transport and combat helicopters. Sri Lankan Defense Secretary Gothabaya Rajapaksa, the president's brother, said the country's Army is currently using several Mi-17 and Mi-24 helicopters, but they want more.
'The Sri Lankan military obviously wants to use the money to meet their equipment needs, as their Army was significantly battered while fighting the Tamil insurgents,' said Mikhail Barabanov, editor-in-chief of Moscow Defense Brief, suggesting Sri Lanka needs a strong army in the event of another Tamil insurgence. |
Jolyroger
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3047 Member Profile
|
13 Feb 2010 06:29:51 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Sri Lanka Air Force s First Jet Aircraft Pilot Ejection.
Pilot officer Noel H. Lokuge ejected safely from his aircraft 50 years ago (01.02.1960) to become the first SLAF (then Royal Ceylon Air Force) pilot to eject from a jet aircraft (a Jet Provost T51). He landed in the Negombo lagoon, was rescued by some fisherman and returned to flying the next day. From the details of his saga he clearly wasn t intending to make history just practicing for the 1960 Independence Day fly past.
A related first is that the Jet Provost he was flying was one of the first jet aircraft purchased by the Sri Lankan government. A body of one, this is on public display in Colombo s Viharamahadevi Park. Found 2 photographs of it on Air-Britain and Airliners.net (which has more details).
Pilot officer Lokuge s bail out was not the last from this list of such incidents involving the SLAF. In practically all of these, Martin-Baker ejection seats are the life saving feature. The Martin-Baker web-site has a page on the Mk 4 ejection seat which is of the type that saved pilot officer Lokuge s life.
According to the article Pilot officer Noel H. Lokuge retired from the air force a Squadron leader in 1976. He seems to have gone on to a distinguished career in civilian aviation.
Comments -
Noel Lokuge is living in Oz.he was flying for Air Ceylon for some time and migrated. He is a distinguished member of the Martin Baker club, which the membership consists of all who ejected (and survived obviously!) with a MB ejection seat.
Not only the Jet Provost was the first jet of the SLAF, it was the first aircraft to drop bombs in anger. SLAF carried out 4 bombing sorties against the JVP insurgents in 1971 on a location close to Kegalle and Medawachchiya using the Jet Provost and was the last of its type to do a operational sortie. Apart from the example that s at Viharamaha devi park, there was a one in immaculately good condition with the SLAF APSU in Ratmalana, but during the mid 1990s it was left out for the rats to work on and the rats did a good job in chewing out its engine parts, avionics, wiring and interior.
Second ejection in SLAF was again off Negambo lagoon, this time with a Flt.Lt (not sure the name-still serving) who had to do a ejection when his Kfir C2 had a engine blowout during early 1990s. Again, like Noel he was fished out by the fisherman for the area but I m not sure of if it was the son of the guy who pulled out Noel Lokuge!
Third ejection was me!
Tinker |
|