|
|
Buddhist monks given training to ensure peaceful co-existence in Sri Lanka
Full News Article
Kamani
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5510
Member Profile
|
 30 Jul 2006 22:16:54 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Hi Shan,
You know your friend is trying his best to attack me. BUt I have nothing against you guys. You see how friendly I am.
Ask about me from Bonggo ayya, Berty ayya, Uncle Kula, TC and Dr Akai whether I am a racist. Some people are just quick to attack women. And this guy is no exception my self and Ruwani (the other Sinhalese girl)are always getting hit out by this loony.
I want to tell you that I don't discriminate people on colour, the incident that this man quotes is referred to Terrorists and you know I am against terrorists nothing to do with tamils as I have tamil friends.
Wherever I mention something this man comes behind and shed some illiterate comment thus shows his education.
Edited By - Kamani - 30 Jul 2006 22:22:41 GMT |
Bonggo
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9204
Member Profile
|
 31 Jul 2006 05:36:34 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Lula,
Yes Kokilavi Kamani is a nice girl but you can have a fight with her and iron out the differences.
Let me relieve some tension.
Ha ha ha ha haaaaa he he heeee heee hoooh hooooo
Lulagey aaley
Gey meda saaley
Api dennagey aaley
Gedara kussiye mulley |
Mucha-linda
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3810
Member Profile
|
 31 Jul 2006 06:21:45 GMT Report for Abuse
|
LULA,
How was the break? Did you enjoy it?
-Muchalinda
. |
LuLa
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2358
Member Profile
|
31 Jul 2006 07:09:20 GMT Report for Abuse
|
My dear Kamani nangi,
I requested you many times and I am still asking you the same.
Personally I have nothing against you.
Even if you cannot change your mentality/attitude its OK, I will not blame you for that but please, please leave me alone.
I stopped long ago but you still keep following me.
Please stop coming behind me (in this forum).
It is not that I do not like you but I am already married.
I hope you will understand, many thanks in advance.
Bonggo,
Lulagey aaley
Gey meda saaley
Ne ne mada valey
Api dennagey aaley
Gedara kussiye mulley
Aiaiyo, kussiye curry muttiye
The slimy slippery Lula from a muddy ditch in the Island once paradise. |
Bonggo
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9204
Member Profile
|
31 Jul 2006 07:12:46 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Machang Linda,
How are you after a long time.
Hope & pray the war will not continue. |
LuLa
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2358
Member Profile
|
31 Jul 2006 07:26:38 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Hi Mucha,
Welcome back, hope you had a wonderful break.
Well, I am going to enjoy my break next week, getting ready to travel, summer vacation.
Thanthai LuLa the ordinary Ponnaiya.
Edited By - LuLa - 31 Jul 2006 07:28:42 GMT |
Muru
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 505
Member Profile
|
31 Jul 2006 14:43:25 GMT Report for Abuse
|
This woman is not only stupid but also a dirty racist, and sometimes hallucinates. Wow i remember calling Kamani that sometime ago, and Lula it was you who told me she is NOT racist! To be honest she is not that racist if you compare her to Nazis like Ruwani. I think all Sinhalas (with only a few exceptions) have the view that the whole island is a Sinhala deepa, including the tamil areas. It's the BS and lies whats every Sinhala kid has been brought up on in school since birth in this last century that has led to this. Here is what the Sinhala Historian K. M. de Silva said:
'...In the Sinhala language, the words for nation, race and people are practically synonymous, and a multiethnic or multicommunal nation or state is incomprehensible to the popular mind. The emphasis on Sri Lanka as the land of the Sinhala Buddhists carried an emotional popular appeal, compared with which the concept of a multiethnic polity was a meaningless abstraction...'
The fact is before the Euros came a large number of SL tamils were living in a kingdom completely independent from the Sinhala people. So even in the past the country was divided. But the difference is at that time, the Sinhala people did NOT CARE if the Tamils had their own state. They had NO DESIRE whatsoever to rule over everyone. The Sinhala masses never went on a holy Buddhist war to save the motherland from being 'divided'. There was no crazy idea at that time floating around that they owned the whole island and that they were the only natives. The difference is now the Sinhala people have become chavinistic as a result of the Sinhala Buddhist revival that was triggered off by the suppression of their culture and religion by the British. And this snowball keeps on rolling. They are teaching history in their schools, which can only be compared to the history taught in Nazi Germany.
The question of who came first is a dumb question only asked by idiots who view history with a mind of a simpleton and who feel they are pure 'aryans'. But hey just to play that game for fun, the Sinhala people claim they came first via Vijaya's entourage. Well if that's the case then Tamils at least came AT THE SAME TIME, because Vijaya GOT HIS WIFE FROM TAMIL NADU and brought Tamil people from various guilds over to colonise the island. And to set the record straight Vijaya was not Sinhala, he was Bengali. The sinhala ethnicity and language was yet to have even been born, even though Tamil language was already fully formed. Remember Sanskrit and Tamil are the only two recognised classical languages of India.
Edited By - Muru - 31 Jul 2006 19:27:56 GMT |
Muru
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 505
Member Profile
|
31 Jul 2006 15:16:53 GMT Report for Abuse
|
I see Great Britain. I don't see Tamil language or Hindu religion be given equal rights. It doesn't matter with these Tamil speakers or Hindus are native white anglos who later assimilated (converted) into Hindu culture.
As I know, only founding cultures of GB enjoy the equal rights in GB. All other migrant cultures, regardless of how many centuries they have existed, do not enjoy equal rights.
See when you see UTTER LIES getting posted in arguments, then you know which side is talking UTTER CRAP. Great Britain consists of Wales, Scotland and England. Both wales and Scotland have their own autonomy. Scotland has their own parliament. The anglo-saxon culture is not the founding culture of GB, just like Sinhalese culture is not the founding culture of Sri Lanka. The indigeneous people of GB are the celts, to which the welsh and people of cornish descent are related to. The anglos invaded GB and soon enough they mixed with the natives and their culture became dominant (along with the viking, Norman and roman invasions).
Similar to how Sinhala culture became dominant after indo-aryan speaking people settled in Lanka. There was a culture/people in Lanka before Sinhala culture evolved. Sinhala culture/language and English culture/langauge ARE BOTH REMNANTS OF MIGRANT CULTURES.
The native Hela people, Nagas and Yakkshas are almost certainly australoid/Dravidian, for example saivate ruins that precede the Buddhist and Vaishaivte ones exist. The veddas worship the vel, and share the same ancestors as the aborginals of Tamil Nadu. The elu language that was once spoken is very close to the proto-dravidian languages, there are too many words shared in the languages for it to be merely concidental. In the Ancient Tamil sangam literature, there is a Tamil speaking Naga poet who says he is from Eelam. So the pre-sankritised hela people did have some links to the Tamils. Not only that according to K.indrapala the ancient hela people and the ancient damelas moved back and forth between Lanka and Tamil Nadu, they did not see each other as foreigners and they seemed to have shared a common gene pool (SISL). It is obvious that these ancient people are the common ancestors to both the SL Tamils and the Singhalas.
Edited By - Muru - 31 Jul 2006 15:21:58 GMT |
Muru
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 505
Member Profile
|
31 Jul 2006 15:28:55 GMT Report for Abuse
|
And even after all this you still get some downright stupid comments from the pure Aryans LOL!
KAMANI:
Why not admit that you guys don't have country other than trying to steal a part of a country
VISHNU :
I'm a Sinhala Racist and I'm proud of it, to remind you all
RUWANI :
Akki, please don't call him anna. That is not a nice word. You can always call him ayya.
We don't have annas in our families, and we don't take pride in having either. I don't what it means. For 2500 years our fore Fathers tried not to know the meaning of such words. And do you expect me to know it now?
RASHIKA:
son: who are tamils. From where they came to our motherland.?
father: they came from south india. English planters brought them as slaves.
Enough said.
Edited By - Muru - 31 Jul 2006 19:26:51 GMT |
Muru
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 505
Member Profile
|
31 Jul 2006 19:39:47 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| The primitive idea that the state must bear the cultural imprint of the majority population is one of almost unbelievable absurdity. A peoples' culture stands or falls by its salience in public life not by how firmly it is embedded in the constitution. Only those who have lost any understanding of their national culture will seek to bolster it by legal and constitutional means. The most slanderous and wicked thing that can be said of Buddhism is that it will be destroyed if it is not made a state religion entrenched in the constitution. Buddhism is one of the world's great religions and one of the noblest heritages of mankind. It has survived for thousands of years without the patronage of the Sinhala people and their state. It is true Buddhism that will someday save the Sinhala people from the unspeakable follies upon which they are now bent. We must turn now to a completely secular state without any cultural or religious markers of the majority population. Only thus can a new state commanding the allegiance of all the people governed by it be constructed and maintained. |
|
Search All News and Discussions