|
|
News Image
Full News Article
suriya
Joined: May 2005 Posts: 95 Member Profile
|
27 Jun 2006 02:44:27 GMT Report for Abuse
|
| I had some respect to magha before. But lately he has been agitated and joined the normal chorus of chauvinist. I have read him repeatedly saying that Prabha has vanished during the Tsunami. He is a drop out. Thamichelvam a barber. All these are irrelevant for the conflict. Telling some person a drop out and barber in this context also type of chauvinism. |
bluewaters
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 547 Member Profile
|
27 Jun 2006 04:17:03 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Tamilcanuk
This is not my friends dad. This is a different gen. kulathunge. I was wondering why he looks fairer. I still feel sorry for him but I am relived its not my friends dad. Gen Parami has no children it seems. |
nada Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 3974 Member Profile
|
27 Jun 2006 05:21:10 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Suriya,
Magha is a nice guy but all these shell shocks have disturbed his brain a little bit and hence these confusion. Otherwise he won't include poor Naleen into the terrorist list!
This barber, dhoby, dropout, etc all mean the traditional mind set with the class difference. Once he narrated that he was going to the house of the 'hospital cleaner' in London for dinner and he was very proud about his 'great deed', sort of Walauwa mentality
In fact I objected at that time saying that the same Magha won't go to the hospital labourer or sanitary labourer's house for a meal in Sri lanka! For that matter he may not even allow them into his house.
But now his slip is showing when he talks of barber, fisherman, dhoby and so on to hit at the Tamil fighters. But Tamils were more cast conscious than the Sinhalese but it was all past and the Tamil blokes have now come a long way from such believes, thanks to our brothers.
But over all Magha is a nice guy and he will improve. |
ajan Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 5387 Member Profile
|
27 Jun 2006 09:04:01 GMT Report for Abuse
|
We all should blame Mahinda for this mans killing if LTTE had killed him.
simply, Mahinda and motorola group Deep penatration Units are targetting LTTE leaders and killed few cardets and spme leaders like Col Ramanan.
IF LTTE killed this man ,it is justifiable purely mahinda took the dirty step by killing Tiger leaders. what you give ehat you get.
but there are reports it was a JVP planed act , because it is a JVP stronghold area. and people are wonder JVP fit a bomb in this Army chiefs car because these days army are in the control of JVP. and JVP can do anything ,just like killing army officers to make room for JVP suporter Army chief to takeover ( just like JVP targetted sarath fonseka to place their man on the job).
motive behind this attack
JVP to place their man on the job,
and
start ethnic war and make political gain.
i pay trubute to Col Ramanan and Gen Parami as they both happend to be born in srilanka. |
Jillball Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 1440 Member Profile
|
27 Jun 2006 09:16:50 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Naleen,
Just to help you out in your mis-identification, there are more than three regularly contributing doctors in the forum. How would you identify professionals here? They mostly talk about politics, which has nothing to do with their professions and yes some do call themselves by their titles but not everybody.
I know Dr.Oldpuli is around, but not a regular anymore, he's been threatened away by the LTTE mafia. |
dumindak Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2755 Member Profile
|
27 Jun 2006 09:59:10 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Magha is wrong to classify Naleen as a threat to national security.
Naleen is a joker and entertainer, next to Bhathiya and Santush and late Fredi silva. He entertain the crowd as long as they cheer him.
Whatever Naleen writes I read, they are so humarous, from time to time jumping here and there.
I can write lot more, but this enough for the time being. |
Bonggo Senior Member
Joined: May 2005 Posts: 9993 Member Profile
|
27 Jun 2006 10:20:44 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Dracula the Vampire,
This is nonsense. The management did not change in 1956. The language changes in 1956 and the standards dropped ever since. |
|