 Return to LNP
This News Site:
Lanka Newspapers is the largest Sri Lanka News forum online. Thousands of Sri Lankans from around the world gather here daily to discuss current news events of Sri Lanka. Join Today!
|
|
|
Hindus set to convert to Buddhism
Full News Article
GamaRaala
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 818
Member Profile
|
7 Dec 2006 20:10:54 GMT Report for Abuse
|
LULA,
In fact no body knows who came first and we will never know. You may have come on Sunday and I may have come on Monday but who cares.
This shows nothing but the intellectual bankruptcy of Eealamists. These bankrupt Eelamists are DEAD SCARED to try the same Sunday-Monday logic with USA, Canadian, Aus and NZ Anglo-christians, and demand EQUAL CULTURAL rights for Tamils who arived late on MONDAY! ;-)
Will they ever give EQUAL CULTURAL RIGHTS for 'Tamil Ethnic' on this LULA's naive, Sunday-Monday logic ?
Mister, as we have pointed numerous times, there is no 'Sinhala Nadu' for Sinhalese to come from. No other place on Earth speak Sinhalese natively besides Sri Lanka. Sinhalese emerged in Sri Lanka, just like Tamils emerged in Tamil Nadu.
That is why 'Tamil Nadu' is the Tamil homeland, and Sri Lanka is the Sinhalese Homeland ;-)
The fact is, as a race (ethnic group), there is NO evidence what so ever to prove that the Sinhalese existed before the 13th CAD.
It must be aliens, came from an outer plannet, planted the numerous stone inscriptions, written in Early Sinhalase in Sri Lanka ;-) Too bad these aliens did not care to 'plant' Tamil inscriptions ;-) Heeyak-Puh!
Edited By - GamaRaala - 8 Dec 2006 05:10:51 GMT |
GreyFox
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1192
Member Profile
|
7 Dec 2006 20:11:42 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Lula
There is NO evidence what so ever that suggests that the Sinhalese indentity DID NOT exist before 13th CAD.
Edited By - GreyFox - 7 Dec 2006 20:25:57 GMT |
Mucha-linda
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2619
Member Profile
|
8 Dec 2006 01:30:45 GMT Report for Abuse
|
ARIYALAI_SB,
Mucha is well known on these forums for cherry picking and quoting people out of context!
Hoh..ho another epitaph for poor Mucha.
According to ARIYALAI_SB, we all know that Mucha is a fool.
Then, *most participants* termed him as one who always wants to have the last word!
And now he has also become famous for Cherry Picking!!
Anyway my friend, I was waiting for you to come up with the following quote.
Let me talk about the concept of Tamils are 'native' to Sri Lanka; you thought that you scored a point on this, well mucha, you haven't; I have always said that the Tamils originated from India, and at the same time, I have also been saying that the Sinhalese also originated from India. So, my point has been that it is ludicrous that the Tamils are not native to Sri Lanka while the Sinhalese are. What is so wrong in that? You can loudmouth all you want, but you cannot carry on claiming that the Sinhalese as a group of people did not originate from India.
Ariyalai, you know very well the answer I gave to the above no matter you agree to that or not. You are well aware of our answer that Sinhalas are not a migrated lot, but a group of people with a unique culture that originated within the island mainly through the assimilation of Vijayan migrants with the Hela Tribes like Yakshas, Nagas etc. Cant you remember, you have even criticized that.
What is really astonishing, in fact, is what stopped you quoting just the above paragraph leaving the very next paragraph (where you criticized the above answer), aside. Are you afraid re-quoting that here, or should this be called PICKING your own CHERRIES.
Let me quote that for you.
You have claimed that the Hela people originated from Yaksha, Naga, Raksha and Deva. Do you have evidence to support this claim, apart from what is written in Mahavamsa? It is paramount, because, without the Hela people you have no way of claiming that the Sinhalese are connected to that mysterious indigenous people; hence, claiming ownership of Sri Lanka.
If one searches on the net about Yaksha, Naga, Raksha and Deva, one would find some hilarious myths
Are you afraid that the above paragraph could upset your friends like LULA, MURU etc who are now speaking about well established NAGA histories of Jaffna. Don?t worry, I will get them to clarify that to you.
You also said that,
I also would like to read both Indrapala's and Gunawardne's books; can I acquire them through internet?
Do you also know that the above mentioned Dr. Indrapalas book (which you are going to for US$14) speaks about historical evidence pertaining to a group of people called NAGAs, whose existence you earlier dismissed as *HILLARIOUS MYTHS*.
Now Ariyalai, if you revisit the post you made at 22 Oct 2005 22:55:21 on
(http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2005/9/3766_37.html?CH11155328566765EN1), you will realize that you have now withdrawn from both the main arguments you once passionately stated (namely, one about NAGAs and the other about NASA image) as proof that Sinhalas too were a migrated lot.
InshAllah!!
Basically, Mucha did not want to confront Taxila; this was the real reason he did not reply to Taxila, even after I asked the above question. It is no good trying to talk to Taxila over a year later when he/she participates no more!
(Here we go again. The person who took almost an year to acknowledge a GROSS LIE he made (having being fooled by a group of FANATICS), is now demanding an apology on behalf of another person over a post which has not been replied)
Ariyalai, I am writing to this forum while doing a full time job and studying part time, in addition to all my readings. As such, please do never expect me to reply to all the persons. If you ever think that I did not confront Taxila because I was afraid, please also learn that I am dead afraid to reply to TIGRESS as well, as I have not answered many of his posts in this thread alone.
-Muchalinda (The cherry picking fool who also wants make the final word according to Most Participents)
.
Edited By - Mucha-linda - 8 Dec 2006 01:31:45 GMT |
Mucha-linda
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2619
Member Profile
|
8 Dec 2006 01:32:47 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Dear READERS,
Being a KONDE BENDAPU JAVANESE, let Muchalinda insist that innocent LULA had no malicious intentions when compiling his PRONOUNCIATION GUIDE which carries references to Theva Nambiya Theesan. Let him also admit categorically that baby LULA have had no prior knowledge about the fairytale about a Tamil King by the name Devanampriya Theesan, authored by Justice Satchi Ponnambalam. If any of us finds any similarity between LULAs Sinhala King and Satchi Ponnambalams Tamil King, please understand that is mainly a case of utter coincident.
Our Chauvinist minds are programmed in a way that we suspect everything. This is an utter shame. For example, when the 1889 British demarcation of North AND East ran exactly along the borders of a 3000 years old Native EELA Tamil Homeland, we failed to understood it as a mere case of coincidence. What a shame. When EELA Tamis have devoloped their own language and a character set which happened to be quite similar to those of another completely unrelated set of people living just few miles away, we never understood it as a case of coincidence. Shame on us, Konde Bendapu Javanese.
-Muchalinda
PS: Heh..heh..!
.
Edited By - Mucha-linda - 8 Dec 2006 01:52:45 GMT |
Pera
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5396
Member Profile
|
8 Dec 2006 02:26:11 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Lula,
As far as I can remember, the Sinhala people are ruling the Tamils ONLY after the 4th February 1948. Thank the British for making the kavum kana yodayas smart.
Who cares about 1948?? In year 5006, people (if there are people on earth by then) will ask, who care what happend in those days???
Sinhalese rule over Tamils in Sri Lanka at this moment! I am happy and content with that!
PERA |
LuLa
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2316
Member Profile
|
8 Dec 2006 05:45:51 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Pera,
Sinhalese rule over Tamils in Sri Lanka at this moment! I am happy and content with that!
I am happy and content to see you happy, so BE HAPPY. |
LuLa
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2316
Member Profile
|
8 Dec 2006 05:52:43 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Shan,
You know why, he was expecting you to quote some Sachi 83 re TN Tissa. Personally I never heard about this story even for a fun.
Me too, heard of GG and Kumar but Sachi??? |
LuLa
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2316
Member Profile
|
8 Dec 2006 06:21:45 GMT Report for Abuse
|
It must be aliens, came from an outer plannet, planted the numerous stone inscriptions, written in Early Sinhalase in Sri Lanka ;-) Too bad these aliens did not care to 'plant' Tamil inscriptions
Yes, aliens such as Demadas (Demadas in Prakrit, Damilas in Pali), Nagas, Yakkhas (Veddhas), Kabojas, Milakas and many others but unfortunately NOT Sinhalese.
Numerous stone inscriptions, written in Early Sinhalase???
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, He, he, he, he, he, Hu, hu, hu, hu, hu, Hooo, hoo, ho, ho, ho.
Which chronicles say that the earliest Brahmi found in numerous stone inscriptions and the early Prakrit in Sri Lanka is Early Sinhalese?
Only some Europeans such as Wilhelm Geiger, first came up with the term Prakrit-Sinhala (3rd CBC - 4th CAD) when he divided the Sinhala language into many phases. What he called as Prakrit-Sinhala is an ancient Prakrit. It was the most common language of the elite, spoken by many in South Asia in ancient times says Dr. Indrapala. Wilhelm Geiger also came up with terms such as Proto-Sinhala (4th CAD - 8th CAD) and proper Sinhala (after 8th CAD) for the developing stages of the Sinhala language.
Edited By - LuLa - 8 Dec 2006 06:22:54 GMT |
GamaRaala
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 818
Member Profile
|
8 Dec 2006 06:41:46 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Lula,
You know why, he was expecting you to quote some Sachi 83 re TN Tissa. Personally I never heard about this story even for a fun.
Yet, you 'independently' came up with the same name to assist pronunciation of Mucha? ;-) |
GamaRaala
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 818
Member Profile
|
8 Dec 2006 06:47:00 GMT Report for Abuse
|
LULA,
Yes, aliens such as Demadas (Demadas in Prakrit, Damilas in Pali), Nagas, Yakkhas (Veddhas), Kabojas, Milakas and many others but unfortunately NOT Sinhalese.
Demada Elara came from India, so 'Demada' cannot be a native ethnic. ;-) Duka-Thamai.
Sinhalese were NOT aliens, there is no other place on Earth that Sinhalese language is natively spoken or Sinhalese ethnic originated ;-)
Edited By - GamaRaala - 8 Dec 2006 08:04:30 GMT |
|
Search All News and Discussions