|
|
Norway blocking Government efforts to corner LTTE
Full News Article
wijeyesinghe
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 464
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 08:08:50 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Norway will do anything to keep themselves in the forefront. At present UK US Canada Indian speaks to Norway.
They speak because Norway are the peaces monitors between LTTE and the Government of Sri Lanka
Do they want to ditch the recognition? |
dumindak
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1143
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 08:32:19 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Many tamil men want to change the sex and age frequetly, good examples are nada and tigeress19. TamChboy(tigeress) has added 19 also to show that he is 19 years old.
When you are born a man it is better to behave like a man. |
muniraj16
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1220
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 08:52:06 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Muchalinda...
great reply buddy...at least now the pro LTTEers will understand what would be the out come when you are against the best SLan brains...
keep up the good work...
chao... |
muniraj16
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1220
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 08:58:33 GMT Report for Abuse
|
DumindaK,
i always had a doubt about his or her gender...first I thought it was due to the pure frustration...but after some time i understood that it was not only the frustration but some thing else is also effecting it...
now i understand, he or she is really confused with his or her own sex...too bad...what to do...we ll sympathize for the poor mentally weak people...
chao... |
dumindak
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1143
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 09:17:38 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Muniraj
can you remember Nada asked you one day your wife is in Middle-east?
If she is a woman, she will not use your wife to insult you. It is always men using mothers and wives to insult men. (And I noticed many more)
when you deal with LTTE supporters you have to have four eyes, two for front and another two for back. |
muniraj16
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1220
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 11:03:58 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Hi DumindaK,
what abt 'nada'?? i was talking abt the other one who has mixed up his or her gender???or may have removed some vital organs...
did you understand the reason behind the change of their respective genders???
cos many Sinhalese were pointing fingers at them saying that they were promoting gay activities and a bunch of gay people and the frustrated butchers were using them as sex toys...
and thats why they have changed their genders...i hope it is only in this forum...i mean i hope they have not done any harm, physically...
and nada may be 'gamini2005' and 'kumara2005'...
well done Muchalinda and dumindaK...
chao... |
muniraj16
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1220
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 11:04:59 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Hi DumindaK,
what abt 'nada'?? i was talking abt the other one who has mixed up his or her gender???or may have removed some vital organs...
did you understand the reason behind the change of their respective genders???
cos many Sinhalese were pointing fingers at them saying that they were promoting gay activities and a bunch of gay people and the frustrated butchers were using them as sex toys...
and thats why they have changed their genders...i hope it is only in this forum...i mean i hope they have not done any harm, physically...
and nada may be 'gamini2005' and 'kumara2005'...
well done Muchalinda and dumindaK...
chao... |
muniraj16
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1220
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 11:10:24 GMT Report for Abuse
|
One final note...both of them were cancelled from this forum for using filth languages and for using multiple user IDs...
and i remember the timings that they appear in the forum are also similar...
chao... |
Ariyalai_SB
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 845
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 11:41:20 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Muchalinda,
Thanks for you reply.
I am afraid you cannot have your cake and eat it the same time. Since the independence back in 1948, Sri Lanka functioned very well indeed with the constitution that represented the union of united Sri Lanka, until the Sinhala Buddhist chauvinists influences; this means that separate territories come together. The British recognised this, as they amalgamated the Sanhala and Tamil kingdoms together for the convenience of easy administration. You can say that the Tamil History in Sri Lanka is a myth, and this is what the Sinhala chauvinists have been manufacturing to support their claims. Again, I say that you liberally claim that the Tamils are racists, unless of course they accept the Sinhala Buddhists hegemony. E.g. Kathirgamar. You say that most of the Tamils are racists just to hide your own shortcomings.
You cannot say that on one hand Sinhala and Buddhism must have the foremost place in Sri Lanka, and then say that you don?t regard that Sinhala is not superior to other races. This is utter rubbish; you can point to Norway, Britain, and other well established nations, and to their constitutions; however, what you are forgetting is that these constitutions were written in the dark ages when the Europe and the Scandinavian counties were evolving, and creating identities for themselves. In Britain for example, the head of state is the Monarchy, and that is also the head of the Church of England; Price Charles, who is next in line for the throne has been publicly stating that he wants to be the defender of FAITHS, but not a FAITH. This is a recognition of the multicultural nature of today?s Britain. They are keen to promote diversity and pluralism by leaning towards secularism.
The fact is that Sri Lanka has two different groups of people who claim to have deep history, culture and their own languages etc; this fact was recorded by the colonial masters who invaded Sri Lanka, and also recognised by Lord Salisbury, when he devised the first constitution for the independent Sri Lanka, as he enacted some clauses to protect the minorities within the united Sri Lanka. In the 60s, when questioned about Sri Lanka, he said, in hindsight, he would have favoured a federal structure for Sri Lanka. |
Ariyalai_SB
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 845
Member Profile
|
24 Aug 2005 11:43:17 GMT Report for Abuse
|
Muchalinda?..continued
The fact remains that the people like you, and your manufactured history, and your arrogance, and your intolerance towards non Sinhala Buddhists, have driven so many other people out of Sri Lanka; this is a fact. What has happened to the Burger community in Sri Lanka? I am sorry; you should say that the Buddhism played a key role in the cultural history within the Sinhala kingdom, but not within of the entire island; this is the myth that you want the Sinhala and the rest of the world to believe. But, the rest of the world know full well that what is really going on in Sri Lanka.
You are comparing the Tamils who took refuge in Norway to the indigenous Tamils in Sri Lanka; this tells me as to who you regard in terms of who is superior, and who is inferior in Sri Lanka. You can hide behind words; but, the fact is that by placing both Sinhala and Buddhism at a special place, you are making the Sinhala Buddhists are the true owners, and true citizens of Sri Lanka, and all the others are secondary, but can enjoy certain privileges. By doing this, you want to invalidate the Tamil claim that they too have distinct identity, language, and deep history within the North and East of the nation.
In your view, those who do not subscribe to your idea of Sri Lanka are all racists; it is as simple as that. You must remember that Sri Lanka is mainly blessed with the followers of four major religions in the world, and we need to celebrate this fact with utmost respect for each other. Buddhism exists all over world, and no harm will be fold, or it will be extinct if it does not enjoy a foremost place in Sri Lanka. If you are really interested in creating a Sri Lankan identity regardless of race, religion, cast, colour, and creed, please shy away from majority community and majority religion, and strive to create a true secular nation; make all feel that they are true Sri Lankans.
You don?t accept that Tamils in Sri Lanka have genuine grievances, and this tells me that you want to subjugate the Tamils in line with the Sinhala Buddhist hegemony; this is an utter violation of the truth that is accepted by the international community, all decent Sinhalese and politicians, and also by the India. I am afraid that you need to come out this Sinhala Buddhist world of yours a bit to comprehend the true nature of the issues in Sri Lanka.
By the way, are you a product of Ananda or Nalanda colleges? |
|
